Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 125.06 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1946–2017 · leading case: I.Z.M. v. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Pub. Schs., 863 F.3d 966 (8th Cir. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

I.Z.M. v. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Pub. Schs., 863 F.3d 966 (8th Cir. 2017). “apable of reading Braille, but often chose not to do so; that his lack of progress in reading Braille did “not negate the fact that he received significant educational benefit from his participation and progress in his classes at the School District”; and that he “met, and often…”

Muehring v. Sch. Dist. No. 31, 28 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. 1947). · cites it 5× “§ 125.06, subds. 12 and 14, school boards “may” in certain cases “provide” free transportation of pupils to and from school.”

Hueman v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 77, 67 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 5× “Such termination shall take effect at the close of the school year in which the contract is terminated in the manner aforesaid.”

Piche v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 621, 634 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 125.06, subd. 2 (1957) (effective until July 1, 1958) (emphasis added).”

Frisk v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Duluth, 75 N.W.2d 504 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 2× “Section 125.06, subd. 10, provides: “Employment of teachers.”

Edwards v. Mettler, 129 N.W.2d 805 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 3× “1953, § 125.06, subd. 12, which read: “It [the board] may, by majority vote, provide for the instruction of any resident pupil in another school district when inadequate room, distance to school, unfavorable road conditions, or other facts or conditions make attendance in his…”

Ketterer v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 79 N.W.2d 428 (Minn. 1956). “The attorney general has also rendered his opinion that, while § 125.06, subd. 2, requires authority of the electors before conveyance of school property can be made, nevertheless, ratification is of equal effect.”

Melby v. Hellie, 80 N.W.2d 849 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 4× “) Section 125.06, subd. 11, reads in part: “It [the school board] may provide for the admission to the schools of the district, of non-resident pupils, * * * and fix the rates of tuition for such pupils.”

Green v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 68 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 2× “As distinguished from the frequently approved form of ballot question which combines several proposals constituting *522 segments of a particular improvement plan, 5 the form of the question submitted on the ballot in the instant case ostensibly presented three alternative…”

Kuehn v. Sch. Dist. No. 70, 22 N.W.2d 220 (Minn. 1946). “The court did not pass on the sufficiency of the evidence or the credibility of plaintiff’s testimony, since the denial of a hearing was conclusive that the board’s action was arbitrary.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.