Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 125.17 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1941 [Repealed, 1945 c 373 s 2]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 56 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2023 · leading case: Berland v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, Minneapolis, 314 N.W.2d 809 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Berland v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, Minneapolis, 314 N.W.2d 809 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 114× “Termination was effectuated under Minn.Stat. § 125.17, subd. 4(5) (1980). Richard Berland petitioned the district court for a writ of certiorari to review the termination of his contract by respondent school district.”

Strand v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 392 N.W.2d 881 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 22× “Specifically at issue is the propriety of certain teacher terminations under the Teacher Tenure Act, Minn.Stat. § 125.17 (1984). Arlene Strand, the most senior of ten members of the home economics department whose services were terminated, contends that her discharge while the…”

Duluth Fed'n of Teachers, Local 692 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 709, 361 N.W.2d 834 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 96× “The union's complaint stemmed from the district's computation of the seniority of laidoff administrators wishing re-employment as teachers pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.17, subd. 11 (1984), instead of the teachers' collective bargaining agreement, resulting in the layoff of…”

Lucio v. Sch. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 574 N.W.2d 737 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 28× “2 See Minn. Stat. § 125.17 (1996) (governing teacher tenure rights in cities of the first class).”

State Ex Rel. Haak v. Bd. of Educ. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 367 N.W.2d 461 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 18× “Paul Public Schools issued notices of discontinuance of the positions to persons affected by the board’s action and informed them that Minn.Stat. § 125.17 (1984) provided for individual hearings regarding the proposed demotions.”

McManus v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 321 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 22× “Appellant claims error in the determination of seniority under Minn.Stat. § 125.17, subd. 11 (1980). We reverse.”

Washington v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 590 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 28× “FACTS Relator was employed by the Minneapolis Public Schools from December 1992 until August 1996, acquiring tenure in the Minneapolis school district pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.17 (1996). In August of 1996, relator took a leave of absence from the Minneapolis schools to work…”

Dokmo v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 4× “1986) (propriety of teacher terminations pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.17.) [1] In effect, the school district argues dichotomous positions: on the one hand, that it did not terminate Dokmo, so it was not required to follow statutory termination procedures, and on the other hand,…”

Westgard v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 745, 400 N.W.2d 341 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 125.17, subd. 11(a) (1984). A similar provision is included in the 1983-35 Master Contract between the district and the Albany Federation of Teachers: Section 8.”

Johnson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 281, 494 N.W.2d 270 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 20× “3, that the contract of a probationary teacher may or may not be renewed "as the school board shall see fit.”

Skeen v. State, 505 N.W.2d 299 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 125.17, subd. 11 (1992). This requirement, combined with the fact that administrative overhead costs are relatively fixed and are slow to adapt to declining enrollment, often causes cost reductions to lag substantially behind enrollment declines.”

Hibbing Educ. Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 369 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Minnesota Teacher Tenure Act explicitly defines the term "teacher" to include "every person regularly employed * * * to give instruction in the classroom * * *" Minn.Stat. 125.17, subd. 1(a) (1984). Accordingly, in order to decide whether a person is a "teacher" under the…”

Show all 56 citing cases →

— Minn. Stat. § 125.17(2) — 1 case

Hagen v. St. Paul Bd. of Educ. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 333 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Minnesota 1971).

— Minn. Stat. § 125.17(4X5) — 1 case

Boyce v. Royal Oak Bd. of Educ., 285 N.W.2d 196 (Mich. 1979).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.