Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 139.10 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 129D.04]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1993–2010 · leading case: Rasmussen v. Glass, 498 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).
Rasmussen v. Glass, 498 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “, Code of Ordinances § 139.10(b)(2) (1991) (emphasis added). The Commission held that relators' refusal to deliver food to the premises of Midwest constituted discrimination on the basis of "creed," defining "creed" as a "formulation or epitome of principles, rules, opinions,…”
Minneapolis Police Dep't v. Kelly, 776 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “" Ordinance § 139.10(b)(4) (emphasis added). We acknowledge that the identification of discriminatory conduct is a challenging and delicate task, and we recognize that the intent of the ordinance is to establish a commission with expertise in making such findings.”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.10(b)(2) — 1 case
Rasmussen v. Glass, 498 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “, Code of Ordinances § 139.10(b)(2) (1991) (emphasis added). The Commission held that relators' refusal to deliver food to the premises of Midwest constituted discrimination on the basis of "creed," defining "creed" as a "formulation or epitome of principles, rules, opinions,…”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.10(b)(4) — 1 case
Minneapolis Police Dep't v. Kelly, 776 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “" Ordinance § 139.10(b)(4) (emphasis added). We acknowledge that the identification of discriminatory conduct is a challenging and delicate task, and we recognize that the intent of the ordinance is to establish a commission with expertise in making such findings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.