Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 139.20 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 129D.15]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep't, 783 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010).
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep't, 783 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “, Code of Ordinances § 139.20. The record indicates three instances of adverse action on the part of the officers.”
Potter v. LaSalle Court Sports & Health Club, 384 N.W.2d 873 (Minn. 1986). “§ 139.20(h). Potter, as a member of the club against whom the club's policy was applied, has standing, i.”
Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 931 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). “MCO § 139.20 (2017). In addition, the amended ordinance exempts four classes of rental properties from its anti-discrimination provisions related to public assistance programs: (1) a room in an owner-occupied single-family dwelling; (2) a single-family dwelling or single…”
Paper v. Rent-A-Wreck, 463 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “"Public accommodations" includes: all services or facilities, other than governmental, of any kind offered or located within the City of Minneapolis which are generally open or offered to the public or which generally solicit public patronage or usage, whether operated for…”
Potter v. LaSalle Sports & Health Club, 368 N.W.2d 413 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “For any person engaged in the *416 provision of public accommodations, because of * * * affectional preference * * 2) To discriminate against any person with respect to the availability of such services and facilities, * * * the scope and quality thereof, or the terms and…”
Rasmussen v. Glass, 498 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “The determination of the meaning of the word "creed" is an issue of first impression.”
Campbell v. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth., 175 F.R.D. 531 (D. Minnesota 1997). “139, § 139.20 (1991). In particular, Campbell claims the MPHA’s inquiries into past drug or alcohol abuse are prohibited by the FHAA and HUD regulations, published at 24 C.”
Big Bros., Inc. v. Minneapolis Comm'n on Civil Rights, 284 N.W.2d 823 (Minn. 1979). “” Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 139.20(g). “ ‘Affectional preference’ means having or manifesting an emotional or physical attachment to another consenting person or persons, or having or manifesting a preference for such attachment, or having or projecting a self-image not…”
Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Rsch. Action ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). “MCO § 139.20 (2017). Whether a landlord qualifies for an “undue hardship” defense is determined after a 270-day process, and the result applies to a single case.”
Fletcher Props., Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Rsch. Action ... (Minn. 2025). “7, § 139.20 (2025) (defining “[p]ublic assistance program” to include any “tenant-based federal, state or local subsidies, 5 including, but not limited to, rental assistance, rent supplements, and housing choice vouchers”).”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.20(2010) — 1 case
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep't, 783 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “, Code of Ordinances § 139.20. The record indicates three instances of adverse action on the part of the officers.”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.20(g) — 1 case
Big Bros., Inc. v. Minneapolis Comm'n on Civil Rights, 284 N.W.2d 823 (Minn. 1979). “” Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 139.20(g). “ ‘Affectional preference’ means having or manifesting an emotional or physical attachment to another consenting person or persons, or having or manifesting a preference for such attachment, or having or projecting a self-image not…”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.20(h) — 2 cases
Potter v. LaSalle Court Sports & Health Club, 384 N.W.2d 873 (Minn. 1986). “§ 139.20(h). Potter, as a member of the club against whom the club's policy was applied, has standing, i.”
Potter v. LaSalle Sports & Health Club, 368 N.W.2d 413 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “For any person engaged in the *416 provision of public accommodations, because of * * * affectional preference * * 2) To discriminate against any person with respect to the availability of such services and facilities, * * * the scope and quality thereof, or the terms and…”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.20(w) — 1 case
Paper v. Rent-A-Wreck, 463 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “"Public accommodations" includes: all services or facilities, other than governmental, of any kind offered or located within the City of Minneapolis which are generally open or offered to the public or which generally solicit public patronage or usage, whether operated for…”
— Minn. Stat. § 139.20(x) — 1 case
Big Bros., Inc. v. Minneapolis Comm'n on Civil Rights, 284 N.W.2d 823 (Minn. 1979). “” Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 139.20(g). “ ‘Affectional preference’ means having or manifesting an emotional or physical attachment to another consenting person or persons, or having or manifesting a preference for such attachment, or having or projecting a self-image not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.