Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 14.01 (2026)
Citation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1966–2016 · leading case: Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1983).
Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1983). “The review provided in this subdivision is not subject to the contested case provisions of the administrative procedure act in sections 14.01 to 14.70. The availability of administrative review for an order of revocation shall have no effect upon the availability of judicial…”
Doe v. Minnesota State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 435 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1989). “; the Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act, Minn.Stat. § 14.01 et seq.: and state administrative rules.”
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul, 884 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. 2016). “, City Charter § 14.01 (2016). The phrase “improvements .”
Hennepin Cnty. Cmty. Servs. Dep't v. Hale, 470 N.W.2d 159 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “88 (1984), and the administrative procedure act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.01 -.69 (1984). The extent of the Commissioner's authority in an appeal under subdivision 4 of section 13.”
Senior Citizens Coalition of Ne. Minnesota v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 355 N.W.2d 295 (Minn. 1984). “To have the force and effect of law, an agency’s rules must be adopted pursuant to the formal rulemak-ing procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Minn.Stat. §§ 14.01 to 14.70 (1982 & Supp.”
Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden Apts., 250 N.W.2d 172 (Minn. 1977). “See, generally, Kozolchyk, Commercial Letters of Credit in the Americas, § 14.01. It should be noted that where injunctive relief is sought, the fraud alleged must be in respect to the documents presented and not as to the underlying transaction.”
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees, 820 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “An administrative agency’s authority to adopt administrative rules is governed by the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.01 -.69 (2010), which requires that administrative rules be promulgated by giving public notice and providing all interested…”
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 469 N.W.2d 718 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “Here, there was no legal basis for [appellants’] position since [appellants] materially changed a rule contrary to the Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act, Minn.Stat. § 14.01 et. seq. See SA-AG Inc.”
Swenson v. State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 329 N.W.2d 320 (Minn. 1983). “3 If such amendment is undertaken, the agency must use the formal rule-making procedures set out in Minn.Stat. §§ 14.01 — .70 (1982). A county decision, however well thought out, to change the implementation of an agency rule is one that must be channeled through the rulemaking…”
L.K. v. Gregg, 380 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “70, and only pursuant to authority delegated by law and in full compliance with its duties and obligations A rule is defined as “every agency statement of general applicability and future effect * * * adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by it *…”
Miller v. Raaen, 139 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. 1966). “1 See, Louisell & Williams, Trial of Medical Malpractice Cases, § 14.01. For a discussion criticizing the application of the doctrine, see Adamson, Medical Malpractice: Misuse of Res Ipsa Loquitur, 46 Minn.”
Kleven v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 399 N.W.2d 153 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “The review provided in this sub *155 division is not subject to the contested case provisions of the administrative procedure act in sections 14.01 to 14.70. The availability of administrative review for an order of revocation shall have no effect upon the availability of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.