§Subdivision 1.Scope.
For the purposes of sections 14.001 to 14.69 the terms defined in this section have the meanings ascribed to them.
§Subd. 2.Agency.
"Agency" means any state officer, board, commission, bureau, division, department, or tribunal, other than a judicial branch court and the Tax Court, having a statewide jurisdiction and authorized by law to make rules or to adjudicate contested cases. "Agency" also means the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board.
§Subd. 3.Contested case.
"Contested case" means a proceeding before an agency in which the legal rights, duties, or privileges of specific parties are required by law or constitutional right to be determined after an agency hearing. "Contested case" does not include hearings held by the Department of Corrections involving the discipline or transfer of inmates or other hearings relating solely to inmate management.
§Subd. 4.Rule.
"Rule" means every agency statement of general applicability and future effect, including amendments, suspensions, and repeals of rules, adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by that agency or to govern its organization or procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Minnesota Ctr. for Env't Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 644 N.W.2d 457 (Minn. 2002).
· cites it 4× “" Minn.Stat. § 14.02, subd. 3 (2000). Here, MPCA's decision not to require an EIS was not a contested case within the meaning of the MAPA because no hearing was required and the only "party" involved in the original decision was Boise Cascade.”
Dietz v. Dodge Cnty., 487 N.W.2d 237 (Minn. 1992).
· cites it 4× “The county, not having statewide jurisdiction, is not subject to the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minn.Stat. § 14.02, subd. 2 (1990), and no statute specifically provides appeal to the courts from an administrative decision to terminate a county nursing home…”
Tischer v. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. of Cambridge, 693 N.W.2d 426 (Minn. 2005).
· cites it 4× “[2] This general rule is stated as being applied to executive bodies that do not have statewide jurisdiction because executive bodies with statewide jurisdiction are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, which specifies the procedure for obtaining judicial review of their…”
Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 625 N.W.2d 165 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 14.02, subd. 8 (2000). An “agency” is defined as any state officer, board, commission, bureau, division, department, or tribunal, other than a judicial branch court and the tax court, having a statewide jurisdiction and authorized by law to make rules or to…”
Jasper v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 642 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. 2002).
· cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 14.02, subd. 4 (2000) (defining a "rule” as "every agency statement of general applicability and future effect, including amendments, suspensions, and repeals of rules, adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by that agency or to…”
Cable Commc'ns Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Commc'ns P'ship, 356 N.W.2d 658 (Minn. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 14.02, subd. 3 (1982). Respondent Nor-West contends that the Board was required to convene a contested case hearing on this matter because it involves the determination of Continental’s legal right to a certificate of confirmation and because the Cable…”
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 437 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1989).
· cites it 2× “A “rule” is defined as “every agency statement of general applicability and future effect, including amendments, suspensions, and repeals of rules, adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by it or to govern its organization or procedure.”
In Re the Rate Appeal of Benedictine Health Ctr., 728 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 2007).
· cites it 4× “A "rule" is defined in the Act as every agency statement of general applicability and future effect * * * adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by that agency or to govern its organization or procedure.”
— Minn. Stat. § 14.02(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.