Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 15.0417 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 14.45]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1980 · leading case: Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Novak, 295 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Novak, 295 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 15.0417 (1978). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. State, 279 N.W.2d 360 (Minn. 1979). “” § 15.0417. 2. While three statutory grounds exist upon which to challenge the validity of the regulations, the sole ground raised by these proceedings is whether the regulations exceed the statutory authority of the *364 agency.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.