Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 15.0419 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 14.60]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1966–1977 · leading case: Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. Mattheis, 147 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. 1966).
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. Mattheis, 147 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. 1966). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
State ex rel. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 276 v. Dep't of Educ., 256 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 1977). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a ‘contested ease’ within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
State Ex Rel. Ind. Sch., Etc. v. Dept. of Ed., 256 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 1977). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a `contested case' within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.