Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 15. STATE AGENCIES IN GENERAL
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 15.0419 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 14.60]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–1977 · leading case: Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. Mattheis, 147 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. Mattheis, 147 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. 1966). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
State ex rel. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 276 v. Dep't of Educ., 256 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 1977). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a ‘contested ease’ within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
State ex rel. Ind. Sch. v. Dept. of Ed., 256 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 1977). “The proceedings before the commissioner of education do not, as to an affected school district, constitute a `contested case' within the meaning of § 15.0419 and for that reason the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.