Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 15.1641 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 328 s 24]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1982 · leading case: Koudsi v. Hennepin Cnty. Med. Ctr., 317 N.W.2d 705 (Minn. 1982).
Koudsi v. Hennepin Cnty. Med. Ctr., 317 N.W.2d 705 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 4× “2a, 5a, and 5b (1978); Minn.Stat. § 15.1641 (1978). In the present action, respondent asserts that the hospital, having notice of her desire that the birth not be disclosed to anyone, was limited in its "use and dissemination" of the information "to that necessary for the…”
Morris v. Danna, 411 F. Supp. 1300 (D. Minnesota 1976). “§ 15.1641(c) provides: “Private or confidential data on individuals shall not be used, collected, stored or dissemmated for any purposes other than those stated to an individual at the time of collection in accordance with section 15.”
Reyes v. Edmunds, 416 F. Supp. 649 (D. Minnesota 1976). · cites it 2× “1975), that they and other defendants illegally collected, stored and used confidential data in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 15.1641(b), 15.-1641(c) and 15.”
— Minn. Stat. § 15.1641(b) — 2 cases
Koudsi v. Hennepin Cnty. Med. Ctr., 317 N.W.2d 705 (Minn. 1982). “2a, 5a, and 5b (1978); Minn.Stat. § 15.1641 (1978). In the present action, respondent asserts that the hospital, having notice of her desire that the birth not be disclosed to anyone, was limited in its "use and dissemination" of the information "to that necessary for the…”
Reyes v. Edmunds, 416 F. Supp. 649 (D. Minnesota 1976). “1975), that they and other defendants illegally collected, stored and used confidential data in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 15.1641(b), 15.-1641(c) and 15.”
— Minn. Stat. § 15.1641(c) — 1 case
Morris v. Danna, 411 F. Supp. 1300 (D. Minnesota 1976). “§ 15.1641(c) provides: “Private or confidential data on individuals shall not be used, collected, stored or dissemmated for any purposes other than those stated to an individual at the time of collection in accordance with section 15.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.