Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Scope.

For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.

Subd. 2.Claim.

"Claim" includes a request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money or property and whether or not the state or a political subdivision has title to the money or property, that:

(1) is presented to an officer, employee, or agent of the state or a political subdivision; or

(2) is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the money or property is to be spent or used on behalf of the state or the political subdivision or to advance the state's or political subdivision's program or interest, and if the state or political subdivision provides or has provided a portion of the money or property that is requested or demanded, or if the state or the political subdivision has reimbursed or will reimburse the contractor, grantee, or other recipient for a portion of the money or property that is requested or demanded.

Claim does not include requests or demands for money or property that the state or a political subdivision has paid to an individual as compensation for state or political subdivision employment, or as an income subsidy with no restrictions on that individual's use of the money or property.

Subd. 3.Knowing and knowingly.

"Knowing" and "knowingly" mean that a person, with respect to information:

(1) has actual knowledge of the information;

(2) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or

(3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information.

No proof of specific intent to defraud is required, but in no case is a person who acts merely negligently, inadvertently, or mistakenly with respect to information deemed to have acted knowingly.

Subd. 3a.Material.

"Material" means having a natural tendency to influence, or be capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money or property.

Subd. 3b.Obligation.

"Obligation" means an established duty, whether or not fixed, arising from an express or implied contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor-licensee relationship from a fee-based or similar relationship, from statute or regulation, or from the retention of any overpayment.

Subd. 4.Original source.

"Original source" means a person who either:

(1) prior to a public disclosure under section 15C.05, paragraph (f), has voluntarily disclosed to the state or a political subdivision the information on which allegations or transactions in a claim are based; or

(2) has knowledge that is independent of and materially adds to the publicly disclosed allegations or transactions, and has voluntarily provided the information to the state or a political subdivision before filing an action under this chapter.

Subd. 5.Person.

"Person" means a natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity but does not include the state or a political subdivision.

Subd. 6.Political subdivision.

"Political subdivision" means a political subdivision of the state and includes a department or agency of a political subdivision.

Subd. 7.Prosecuting attorney.

"Prosecuting attorney" means:

(1) the attorney general, if the false or fraudulent claim involves money, property, or services provided by the state; or

(2) the county attorney, city attorney, or other attorney representing a political subdivision, if the false or fraudulent claim involves money, property, or services provided by the political subdivision.

Subd. 8.State.

"State" means the state of Minnesota and includes a department or agency of the state.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp., 919 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. 2018).
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp., 919 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. 2018). · cites it 8× “The MFCA "tax bar" precludes actions if the defendant's allegedly false claim stems from "portions of Minnesota Statutes relating to taxation.”
Paul Allen Olson v. Fairview Health Servs. of MN, 831 F.3d 1063 (8th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 3729 (b)(1)(A) (defining knowledge as actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, or reckless disregard for the truth); Minn. Stat. § 15C.01, subdiv. 3 (same). I agree with the premise that “[a]n FCA defendant does not act ‘with the knowledge that the FCA requires before liability…”
United States v. Minnesota Transitions Charter Schs., 50 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 6× “§ 3729 (a); and (3) violation of the MFCA, Minn.Stat. § 15C.01. (Id. ¶¶ 59-73.) The United States and the State of Minnesota *1111 declined to intervene.”
United States ex rel. King v. Solvay S.A., 823 F. Supp. 2d 472 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “Minn.Stat. Ann. § 15C.01 (West, Westlaw current through 2011 Reg.”
United States ex rel. Dickson v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 123 F. Supp. 3d 584 (D.N.J. 2015). “§§ 1-605 to -618, 108A-63; (Count 26) Minnesota False Claims Act, Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq.; (Count 27) Colorado Medicaid False Claims Act, Colo.”
Feinwachs v. HealthPartners, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2019). · cites it 2× “, and the Minnesota False Claims Act (MFCA), Minn. Stat. §§ 15C.01 et seq. Over the nearly 9-year history of this lawsuit, multiple claims and defendants have been added and dismissed.”
United States v. Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care LLC, 135 F. Supp. 3d 944 (2015). “, and the Minnesota False Claims Act (“MFCA”), Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq,, against Defendant GGNSC Anoka LLC and the related family of companies.”
United States of Am. v. Siemens Med. Solutions USA, Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2023). “; the Minnesota False Claims Act, Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq.; the Montana False Claims Act, Mont.”
Sturgeon v. Pharmerica Corp. (E.D. Pa. 2020). “615 (West 2019); Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 15C.01–.16 (West 2019); Mont.”
United States v. Siemens Med. Solutions USA, Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2025). “; the Minnesota False Claims Act, Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq.; the Montana False Claims Act, Mont.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.