Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 16.10 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1978 c 480 s 3]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1967–2003 · leading case: Jorgensen v. Knutson, 662 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 2003).
Jorgensen v. Knutson, 662 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 2003). “" 3 Eric Mills Holmes, Holmes' Appleman on Insurance 2d § 16.10 at 447 (1998). Good policy rationale support a legislative decision to force insurers to strictly comply with the notice provisions of statutes, or risk covering the accidents of insureds that they attempted to…”
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1980). “3 Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 16.10 (2d ed. 1977) (hereinafter Anderson); 1 Rathkopf § 9.”
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1984). “, citing 3 Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 16.10 (2d ed. 1977); 1 Rathkopf § 9.03.”
Butler v. Hatfield, 152 N.W.2d 484 (Minn. 1967). “” Section 16.10 provides in part: “* * * [N]o purchase order or contract shall be valid or effective without the approval and signature of the commissioner and the countersignature of the auditor, who shall certify that the appropriation and allotment have been encumbered for…”
Williams v. Hoyt Constr. Co., Inc., 237 N.W.2d 339 (Minn. 1975). “307 (1935); 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16.10. Thus, it might be more accurate to discuss the issue in terms of the “traveling man” rule, which holds that a traveling employee is within the protection of the act when within his usual territory.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.