Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 169.11 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 2014 c 255 s 21]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1943–2008 · leading case: State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. 1991).
State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. 1991). “2d 480 (1946), the appellant contended that a statute allowing the prosecution of an individual who took the life of another by operating a vehicle in a "reckless or grossly negligent manner," Minn.Stat. § 169.11 (1941), was unconstitutionally vague.”
State v. Soto, 378 N.W.2d 625 (Minn. 1985). “464, § 25, first codified in the highway code at Minn.Stat. § 169.11 (1941). The term "human being" has been used repeatedly in subsequent modifications of that statute.”
State v. Losh, 755 N.W.2d 736 (Minn. 2008). “Minn.Stat. § 169.11 (2006). Minn.Stat. § 171.”
State v. Bolsinger, 21 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. 1946). “1941, § 169.11 *156 '(Mason'St; 1940 Supp. § 2720-175), which so far as here pertinent reads: “Any person who by operating or driving a vehicle of any kind in a reckless or grossly negligent manner causes a .”
State v. Engle, 743 N.W.2d 592 (Minn. 2008). “§§ 169.11,169.13 *595 (2006) (current statutes dealing with criminal negligence and reckless driving); State v.”
State v. Capelle, 172 N.W.2d 556 (Minn. 1969). “1961, §§ 169.11 and 169.121. L. 1957, c. 297, repealed Minn.”
State v. Anderson, 78 N.W.2d 320 (Minn. 1956). “While the evidence would support a finding that decedent, knowing defendant was intoxicated, was guilty of gross negligence in permitting him to drive the car, this would not constitute a superseding intervening cause of the accident but rather, at the most, a concurring…”
Simon v. Carroll, 62 N.W.2d 822 (Minn. 1954). “Section 169.11, subds. 1, 2, and B, limits a motorist to a speed no greater than is reasonable with respect to the surrounding actual and potential hazards and then provides that, in the daytime on roads outside municipalities, a speed in excess of 60 miles per hour is prima…”
State v. Ewing, 84 N.W.2d 904 (Minn. 1957). “It is apparent from the circumstances of the collision that whoever drove the automobile was in violation of § 169.11 in operating it in a reckless or grossly negligent manner.”
Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc., 38 N.W.2d 51 (Minn. 1949). “Section 169.11, subd. 3, reads in part: *531 “The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection * * Paulson violated this statute, according to his own testimony.”
Dehn v. Comm'r of the Dep't of Pub. Saf., 442 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “, Minn.Stat. § 169.11 (1988) (revocation for conviction of criminal negligence in the operation of a vehicle resulting in the death of a human being); Minn.”
State v. Peterson, 123 N.W.2d 177 (Minn. 1963). “11 has been defined as conscious and intentional driving which a driver knows, or should know, creates an unreasonable risk of harm to others even though there is no intent to do harm.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.