Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 169.12 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1957 c 297 s 2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1943–2019 · leading case: Marben v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 294 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. 1980).
Marben v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 294 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. 1980). “Section 169.12?, subd. 2, was amended by 1978 Minn.”
Adamson v. Dougherty, 81 N.W.2d 110 (Minn. 1957). “***** “Section 169.12: ‘It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or operate any vehicle within this State.”
State v. Wood, 922 N.W.2d 209 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). “552, § 1, at 1173 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 169.12 (1941) ). In 1957, the driving-while-intoxicated statute was amended to provide that, in a criminal prosecution, the district court "may admit evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood taken voluntarily within two…”
Seeley Ex Rel. Seeley v. Sobczak, 281 N.W.2d 368 (Minn. 1979). “* * * * * * * * "* * * [T]here is a manifest difference between the term `under the influence of intoxicating liquor' (§ 169.12), as *371 used in our traffic laws, and the term `obviously intoxicated,' as used in § 340.”
Martinka v. Hoffmann, 8 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 169.12 (Mason St. 1941 Supp. § 2720-176); and L.”
Strand v. Vill. of Watson, 72 N.W.2d 609 (Minn. 1955). “6 In that respect, while the terms may be more or less synonymous, there is a manifest difference between the term “under the influence of intoxicating liquor” (§ 169.12), as used in our traffic laws, and the term “obviously intoxicated,” as used in § 340.”
Dahlin v. Kron, 45 N.W.2d 833 (Minn. 1950). “Neither do we consider it reversible error under the facts and circumstances here that the court failed to instruct the jury under § 169.12 that it is unlawful for any person who is a habitual user of narcotic drugs or under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or…”
State v. Capelle, 172 N.W.2d 556 (Minn. 1969). “1953, § 169.12, and enacted in its place § 169.”
State v. Weeks, 12 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 169.12 [Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 2720-176]) is: “Every person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten, nor more than 90, days or by a fine of not less than $10.”
State v. Murray, 26 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. 1947). “1945, § 169.12. 2 The jury having returned a verdict of guilty and defendant’s alternative motion for an order granting judgment in his behalf notwithstanding the verdict or, if that be denied, for a new trial having been denied, he appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.