Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 169.127 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1978 c 727 s 11]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1978–1984 · leading case: Goldsworthy v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 268 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Goldsworthy v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 268 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 4× “The issue raised on appeal is: May a driver’s license be revoked pursuant to § 169.127, subd. 2, where the notice of intent to revoke is sent by certified mail to the driver’s home and signed for by his wife, but where the driver claims the notice was never given to him? Minn.”

State, Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Wiehle, 287 N.W.2d 416 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 4× “Based on the results of the test, the commissioner of public safety proposed revocation of Wiehle’s driving privileges for 90 days pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.127, subd. 2. 1 Wiehle requested a hearing which was held in the Municipal Court of Hennepin County, the order of…”

Heller v. Wolner, 269 N.W.2d 31 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 4× “1976, § 169.127, subd. 3. 1 We hold that jurisdiction was not lost because the 30-day period is directory and not a limitation on the court’s jurisdiction.”

State v. Abe, 289 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 4× “The issues presented are: (1) Whether Minn.Stat. § 169.127 (1976) required a police officer to advise a driver that if the driver submitted to a blood test and the results of the test indicated a blood alcohol concentration above .”

Szczech v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 343 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 169.127(3) (1976). To reiterate, under the new statute: A hearing under this section shall be before a municipal or county judge, in any county in the judicial district where the alleged offense occurred .”

McIntee v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 279 N.W.2d 817 (Minn. 1979). “§ 169.127, which is similar to the prerevocation hearing under the implied consent statute § 169.”

State, Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Hauge, 286 N.W.2d 727 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 169.127 (1976) has been repealed.”

— Minn. Stat. § 169.127(3) — 1 case

Szczech v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 343 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn.Stat. § 169.127(3) (1976). To reiterate, under the new statute: A hearing under this section shall be before a municipal or county judge, in any county in the judicial district where the alleged offense occurred .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.