Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 169.44 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1991 c 277 s 18]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1983–1987 · leading case: Jam v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 709, 413 N.W.2d 165 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jam v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 709, 413 N.W.2d 165 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 32× “# 709 argue that the equipment and procedural requirements contained in Minnesota statutes and Board of Education rules do not apply because the DTA bus was not a "school bus" within the meaning of Minn.Stat. §§ 169.44 and 169.45. "School bus" was defined for purposes of Chapter…”

State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 169.44, subd. lc (1982) (probable cause arrest allowable for one suspected of driving through a school bus stop sign); section 629.”

State v. Miho, 372 N.W.2d 754 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 8× “Appellant was convicted of violating Minn.Stat. § 169.44 (1984), disobeying a school bus stop signal.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.