Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 169A.276 (2026)

Mandatory Penalties; Felony Violations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Mandatory prison sentence.

(a) The court shall sentence a person who is convicted of a violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) under the circumstances described in section 169A.24 (first-degree driving while impaired) to imprisonment for not less than three years. In addition, the court may order the person to pay a fine of not more than $14,000.

(b) The court may stay execution of this mandatory sentence as provided in subdivision 2 (stay of mandatory sentence), but may not stay imposition or adjudication of the sentence or impose a sentence that has a duration of less than three years.

(c) An offender committed to the custody of the commissioner of corrections under this subdivision is not eligible for release as provided in section 241.26, 244.065, 244.12, or 244.17, unless the offender has successfully completed treatment recommendations as determined by a substance use disorder assessment while incarcerated.

(d) Notwithstanding the statutory maximum sentence provided in section 169A.24 (first-degree driving while impaired), when the court commits a person to the custody of the commissioner of corrections under this subdivision, it shall provide that after the person has been released from prison the commissioner shall place the person on conditional release for five years. The commissioner shall impose any conditions of release that the commissioner deems appropriate including, but not limited to, successful completion of an intensive probation program as described in section 169A.74 (pilot programs of intensive probation for repeat DWI offenders). If the person fails to comply with any condition of release, the commissioner may revoke the person's conditional release and order the person to serve all or part of the remaining portion of the conditional release term in prison. The commissioner may not dismiss the person from supervision before the conditional release term expires. Except as otherwise provided in this section, conditional release is governed by provisions relating to supervised release. The failure of a court to direct the commissioner of corrections to place the person on conditional release, as required in this paragraph, does not affect the applicability of the conditional release provisions to the person.

(e) The commissioner shall require persons placed on supervised or conditional release under this subdivision to pay as much of the costs of the supervision as possible. The commissioner shall develop appropriate standards for this.

Subd. 2.Stay of mandatory sentence.

The provisions of sections 169A.275 (mandatory penalties; nonfelony violations), subdivision 3 or 4, and subdivision 5, and 169A.283 (stay of execution of sentence), apply if the court stays execution of the sentence under subdivision 1 (mandatory prison sentence). In addition, the provisions of section 169A.277 (long-term monitoring) may apply.

Subd. 3.Driver's license revocation; no stay permitted.

The court may not stay the execution of the driver's license revocation provisions of section 169A.54 (impaired driving convictions and adjudications; administrative penalties).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 2004–2019 · leading case: Heilman v. Courtney, 926 N.W.2d 387 (Minn. 2019).
Heilman v. Courtney, 926 N.W.2d 387 (Minn. 2019). · cites it 60× “Appellant Donald Heilman, a participant in the Challenge Incarceration Program administered by the Department of Corrections (Department), contends that he was "released from prison" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d) (2018), when he entered phase II of…”
Maiers v. Roy, 847 N.W.2d 524 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 28× “The district court denied appellant’s petition, concluding that his sentence included a term of conditional release under Minn.Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d), and that appellant was on conditional release when he violated his release conditions.”
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota, 863 N.W.2d 88 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 10× “2 On April 29, 2013, the district court amended appellant’s sentence a third time, adding the five-year conditional-release term after the DOC sent a letter to the sentencing court on April 24, 2013, informing it that appellant’s sentence “did not mention the five year…”
State ex rel. Huseby v. Roy, 903 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 22× “The district court also imposed a five-year conditional release term, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d). 1 Appellant was committed to the custody, of the commissioner of corrections and was first confined at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at St.”
Thong v. State, 892 N.W.2d 842 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 20× “Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d), authorizes a district court to impose a conditional-release period when it executes a sentence.”
Oldenburg v. State, 763 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d) (2002).”
State v. Boecker, 893 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 2017). · cites it 2× “Compare Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(a) (2016), with Minn.”
State v. Wright, 699 N.W.2d 782 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “The state argues that Minn.Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(b) (2002) prohibits the district court from staying adjudication in felony DWI cases.”
State v. Zeimet, 696 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 2× “The person is subject to the mandatory penalties described in section 169A.276 (mandatory penalties; felony violations).”
State v. Kier, 678 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Kier also argues that because Minn.Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(b) (2002) allows the district court to stay the mandatory minimum sentence, the sentencing court abused its discretion by not staying his 66-month sentence for refusal to submit to testing or his 12-month sentence for…”
Brooks v. Roy, 881 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (D. Minnesota 2012). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(c). . The R & R found that there is no private cause of action under the AIFRA, and Brooks does not object to this conclusion.”
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Comm'r of Corr., 887 N.W.2d 271 (Minn. 2016). “§ 169A.276, subd. 1(d) (2014) (“[A]fter the person has been released from prison the commissioner shall place the person on conditional release for five years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.