Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 169A.50 (2026)

Citation

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 may be cited as the Implied Consent Law.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: State v. Mike, 919 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Mike, 919 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “48 (2016), administrative provisions are found in sections 169A.50 to 169A.63 (2016 & Supp.”

State v. Wood, 922 N.W.2d 209 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 5× “48; "Administrative Provisions," Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.50 -.63; and "Miscellaneous Provisions," Minn.”

Johnson v. Comm'r Saf., 911 N.W.2d 506 (Minn. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.50 -.53 (2016). The Commissioner must revoke the driver's license of a person who refuses to submit to a test when a peace officer certifies that there was probable cause to believe that the person was driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol or…”

State v. Melde, 725 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 2006). “1(a), provides: Any person who drives, operates, or is in physical control of a motor vehicle within this state or on any boundary water of this state consents, subject to the provisions of sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 (implied consent law), and section 169A.”

State v. Wiltgen, 737 N.W.2d 561 (Minn. 2007). “Sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 of the implied consent law address the chemical tests .”

State v. Myers, 711 N.W.2d 113 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Any person who drives, operates, or is in physical control of a motor vehicle within this state or on any boundary water of this state consents, subject to the provisions of sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 (implied consent law), and section 169A.”

Morehouse v. Comm'r Saf., 911 N.W.2d 503 (Minn. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.50 -.53 (2016). The Commissioner of Public Safety must revoke the driver's license of a person who submits to a test when the test results indicate an alcohol concentration greater than the legal limit or the presence of a controlled substance, and a…”

Mortenson v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 918 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “3(a) (2016) ; see Minn. Stat. § 169A.50 (2016) (" Sections 169A.”

Jennifer Leu v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf. (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “4(a) (2022) (emphasis added); see Minn. Stat. § 169A.50 (2022) (“Sections 169A.”

Clark v. State of Minnesota Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Driver & Vechicles Servs. (D. Minnesota 2020). · cites it 2× “1 I Clark’s driver’s license was administratively revoked on November 19, 2003, pursuant to Minnesota’s implied consent law, Minn. Stat. § 169A.50–.53, after he was arrested for driving while impaired one week earlier.”

Jack Eugene Christiansen v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf. (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Respondent Commissioner of Public Safety revoked Christiansen’s driver’s license under Minnesota’s Implied Consent Law, Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.50–.53. Christiansen challenged the revocation in the district court, arguing that under Missouri v.”

Tammy Marie Salisbury v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Salisbury also attempts to rely on the right-to-review section of the Minnesota Implied Consent Law, Minn. Stat. §§ 169A.50–.53 (2012). Again, that section provides that “[w]ithin 30 days following receipt of a notice and order of revocation .”

Show all 14 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.