Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 171.245 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1978 c 727 s 11]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1977–1998 · leading case: State v. Pieschke, 295 N.W.2d 580 (Minn. 1980).
State v. Pieschke, 295 N.W.2d 580 (Minn. 1980). “Defendant, Dlaine Ernest Pieschke, was charged with aggravated driving while under the influence of alcohol (Minn.Stat. § 171.245 (1976)), 1 driving while under the influence (Minn.”
State v. Aarsvold, 376 N.W.2d 518 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “1977), the trial court dismissed gross misdemeanor prosecutions under Minn. Stat. § 171.245 (1976) after ruling that the statute only applied to those drivers arrested for driving while intoxicated during the period of ineligibility for a new license.”
State v. Wicks, 258 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 1977). “The state appeals from an order of the Hennepin County District Court dismissing six of the cases following the trial court’s ruling that § 171.245 should be limited in application to those instances where drivers are arrested for driving under the influence during the period of…”
State v. Stankey, 302 N.W.2d 347 (Minn. 1981). “297, § 1, and then codified in Minn.Stat. § 171.245 (1976), provided: Any person who operates a motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license, upon the highways in this state in violation of section 169.”
State Ex Rel. Hall v. Schlaegel, 502 S.E.2d 190 (W. Va. 1998). “2d at 348 (quoting Minn.Stat. § 171.245 (1976)). 5 . See supra note 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.