Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 176.13 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1965 c 327 s 2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1945–1983 · leading case: Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'n, 142 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1966).
Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'n, 142 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1966). “In a memorandum attached to such findings, the referee said: “Decision that the last employer and insurer on the risk on August 18, 1962, are responsible for disability and medical care thereafter appears mandatory under the provisions of Section 176.13. “The injury of December…”
McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co., 104 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1960). “We are especially concerned here with the interpretation and effect of § 176.13(a, b, c), which provides: “(a) If an employee who has a physical impairment from any cause or origin incurs a subsequent disability by injury arising out of and in the course of his employment…”
Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co., 45 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 1951). “Whether total disability benefits are to be paid out of the fund rests solely in the sound discretion of the industrial commission, which by statute is directed to pay such benefits as other payments of compensation are paid.”
Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co., 91 N.W.2d 463 (Minn. 1958). “1949, § 176.13, which provides in part: "All employees who are now receiving, or who may hereafter become entitled to receive, compensation for permanent total disability, whether from the employer or from the special fund, after receiving the full amount of $10,000 for such…”
Boltz v. Armour Agric. Chem. Co., 131 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1964). “Shortly thereafter and pursuant to § 176.13(a, b, c), relator filed the present petition with the commission for an order joining the special compensation fund in these proceedings so that relator might have reimbursement for any compensation it may be required to pay the…”
Beson v. Carleton Coll., 136 N.W.2d 82 (Minn. 1965). “The object intended to be secured by § 176.13 is advanced, we believe, if an employer-insurer who has done everything reasonably possible to qualify for the relief this law affords is allowed reimbursement from the special fund.”
Reichert v. Victory Granite Co., 82 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1957). “1949, § 176.13, dealt with disability or death resulting from accident; increase of previous disability; and special compensation fund.”
Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works, 84 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 1957). “In all three of these cases the Industrial Commission awarded compensation to the dependents at the rate of $20 per week to continue during the dependency of the minor children, but not to exceed the total additional sum of $2,500, to be paid by the employers and their insurers.…”
Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store, 117 N.W.2d 386 (Minn. 1962). “1953, § 176.13, often referred to as the subsequent or successive injury statute.”
Skjefstad v. Red Wing Potteries, Inc., 60 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1953). “The stipulation also provided that it was the intention of the parties that nothing therein should jeopardize any rights which petitioners might have for further benefits from the special fund under § 176.13. It was then agreed in the stipulation that the insurer pay petitioners…”
Thorwald v. Schmahl, 24 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1946). “It was further stipulated: “* * * That said Roy Munroe was receiving compensation on and subsequent to the 23d day of April, 1941, being the effective date of the amendment to Section 176.13 General Laws Minnesota (Section 4276 as amended Mason’s Minnesota Statutes).”
Loew v. Hagerle Bros., 33 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 1948). “In fact, it can apply to no other person, in that he is the only employe who has been totally and permanently disabled for a period of 20 years prior to the date of enactment and whose weekly compensation payments terminated during the six-month period between July 1, 1939, and…”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(2) — 1 case
Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co., 45 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 1951). “Whether total disability benefits are to be paid out of the fund rests solely in the sound discretion of the industrial commission, which by statute is directed to pay such benefits as other payments of compensation are paid.”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(a) — 3 cases
Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'n, 142 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1966). “In a memorandum attached to such findings, the referee said: “Decision that the last employer and insurer on the risk on August 18, 1962, are responsible for disability and medical care thereafter appears mandatory under the provisions of Section 176.13. “The injury of December…”
Hegdahl v. City of Minneapolis, 129 N.W.2d 798 (Minn. 1964).
Jansky v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 331 N.W.2d 246 (Minn. 1983).
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(b) — 1 case
Rikala v. Rundquist Constr. Co., 77 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1956).
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(c) — 11 cases
Beson v. Carleton Coll., 136 N.W.2d 82 (Minn. 1965). “The object intended to be secured by § 176.13 is advanced, we believe, if an employer-insurer who has done everything reasonably possible to qualify for the relief this law affords is allowed reimbursement from the special fund.”
Boltz v. Armour Agric. Chem. Co., 131 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1964). “Shortly thereafter and pursuant to § 176.13(a, b, c), relator filed the present petition with the commission for an order joining the special compensation fund in these proceedings so that relator might have reimbursement for any compensation it may be required to pay the…”
McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co., 104 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1960). “We are especially concerned here with the interpretation and effect of § 176.13(a, b, c), which provides: “(a) If an employee who has a physical impairment from any cause or origin incurs a subsequent disability by injury arising out of and in the course of his employment…”
Reichert v. Victory Granite Co., 82 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1957). “1949, § 176.13, dealt with disability or death resulting from accident; increase of previous disability; and special compensation fund.”
Skjefstad v. Red Wing Potteries, Inc., 60 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1953). “The stipulation also provided that it was the intention of the parties that nothing therein should jeopardize any rights which petitioners might have for further benefits from the special fund under § 176.13. It was then agreed in the stipulation that the insurer pay petitioners…”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(d) — 1 case
McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co., 104 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1960). “We are especially concerned here with the interpretation and effect of § 176.13(a, b, c), which provides: “(a) If an employee who has a physical impairment from any cause or origin incurs a subsequent disability by injury arising out of and in the course of his employment…”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(e) — 1 case
Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co., 104 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1960).
— Minn. Stat. § 176.13(e)(2) — 1 case
Knaeble v. City of Crystal, 271 N.W.2d 833 (Minn. 1978).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.