Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 176.18 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1953 c 755 s 83]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1943–2000 · leading case: Krossen v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 85 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. 1957).
Krossen v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 85 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. 1957). “The commission held the present action barred by § 176.18 which provided: “The time within which the following acts shall be performed shall be limited to the following periods, respectively: “(1) Actions or proceedings by an injured employee to determine or recover…”
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co., 29 N.W.2d 8 (Minn. 1947). “of the accident and about two months after the accident occurred the employer filed with the commission a final receipt for compensation paid to the employe for temporary total disability caused by the injury, a proceeding commenced about 11 years after the filing of the receipt…”
Knopp v. Gutterman, 102 N.W.2d 689 (Minn. 1960). “1949, § 176.18, limiting actions prior to 1953, was repealed under the 1953 recodification of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, L.”
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 115 N.W.2d 22 (Minn. 1962). “141] shall have been given to the employer, and unless the claim is filed with the commission with[in] the period specified in section 176.18 [now § 176.151], except that in case of silicosis or asbestosis the claim may be filed with the commission within three years after the…”
Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co., 20 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1945). “Although there is a provision in the act limiting the time within which an action may be commenced (§ 176.18 [Mason St. 1927, § 4282]), once the industrial commission has acquired jurisdiction by the filing of a claim petition, its jurisdiction attaches and continues until it is…”
Rasmussen v. City of St. Paul, 10 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. 1943). “So the sole question here is whether, as a matter of law, the commission was required to hold that respondent’s cause is barred.”
Mohrlant v. Lampland Lumber Co., 23 N.W.2d 172 (Minn. 1946). “The workmen’s compensation act limits actions or proceedings by an injured employe to determine or recover compensation to two years after the employer has made a written report of the injury to the commission, but not to exceed six years from the date of the injury.”
Peters v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., 26 N.W.2d 29 (Minn. 1947). “This is a controversy between the employer and its insurer, on one side, and the custodian of the special compensation fund created under § 176.18 (§ 4276), on the other, to determine in what proportions they are liable respectively to the employe for compensation for permanent…”
Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 523a-17, 523a-27) (Minn. Att'y Gen. 2000). “1) an Amended Order to Comply and Penalty assessment dated September 24, 1998; Z) an Order to Comply and Penalty Assessment dated September 25, 1998; and 3) an Objection to the Amended Order to Comply and Penalty Assessment filed with DOLI (received on October 6, 1998) by the…”
Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 523a-17, 523a-27) (Minn. Att'y Gen. 2000). “1) an Amended Order to Comply and Penalty assessment dated September 24, 1998; 2) an Order to Comply and Penalty Assessment dated September 25, 1998; and 3) an Objection to the Amended Order to Comply and Penalty Assessment filed with DOLI (received on October 6, 1998) by the…”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.18(1) — 4 cases
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co., 29 N.W.2d 8 (Minn. 1947). “of the accident and about two months after the accident occurred the employer filed with the commission a final receipt for compensation paid to the employe for temporary total disability caused by the injury, a proceeding commenced about 11 years after the filing of the receipt…”
Krossen v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 85 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. 1957). “The commission held the present action barred by § 176.18 which provided: “The time within which the following acts shall be performed shall be limited to the following periods, respectively: “(1) Actions or proceedings by an injured employee to determine or recover…”
Knopp v. Gutterman, 102 N.W.2d 689 (Minn. 1960). “1949, § 176.18, limiting actions prior to 1953, was repealed under the 1953 recodification of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, L.”
Rasmussen v. City of St. Paul, 10 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. 1943). “So the sole question here is whether, as a matter of law, the commission was required to hold that respondent’s cause is barred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.