Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 176.242 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1987 c 332 s 117]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1986–1995 · leading case: Violette v. Midwest Printing Co.-Webb Publ'g, 415 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. 1987).
Violette v. Midwest Printing Co.-Webb Publ'g, 415 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. 1987). “Upon Viol-ette’s request, on December 2, 1985, an administrative conference was held pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.242 (1984). A rehabilitation specialist presiding at the conference received evidence and heard arguments from each party’s attorney and determined that reasonable…”
Kaluza v. Home Ins. Co., 403 N.W.2d 230 (Minn. 1987). “See Minn.Stat. § 176.242 (1984). Another administrative conference was held on August 4,1983.”
Manderfeld v. JC Penney, 526 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. 1995). “Minn.Stat. § 176.242, subd. 6 (1983), repealed by Act of May 29, 1987, ch.”
Hammer v. Mark Hagen Plumbing & Heating, 435 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1989). “The employee exercised his right under Minn.Stat. § 176.242 (1986) (repealed 1987) and requested an administrative hearing on the NOID.”
Kulenkamp v. Pauline's of Shelard, 388 N.W.2d 745 (Minn. 1986). “Section 176.242, subdivision 8, provides in part: If the commissioner has denied a requested discontinuance and a compensation judge later rules that the discontinuance was proper, payments made under the commissioner’s order as provided under subdivision 4 shall be treated as…”
Robinson v. Minnesota Valley Improvement Co., 401 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1987). “An interim administrative decision of the Department of Labor and Industry, see Minn.Stat. § 176.242 (1984), denied discontinuance.”
Kautz v. Setterlin Co., 410 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. 1987). “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.242 (1984), an administrative conference was held on December 5, 1985; and benefits were discontinued.”
Hastings v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies, 404 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “(In 1986, the legislature added: “(e) unreasonably or vexatiously discontinued compensation in violation of section 176.242.”) Although the 1980 version of § 176.”
Urbanski v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 280, 446 N.W.2d 388 (Minn. 1989). “This penalty may also be imposed on an employer or insurer who violates section 176.242 or 176.243 *390 including, but not limited to, violating the commissioner’s decision not to discontinue compensation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.