Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 176. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 176.35 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1953 c 755 s 83]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1957–2014 · leading case: Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc., 82 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1957).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc., 82 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1957). “…Minnesota citizens the protection which the Civil Damage Act intended for them. Reversed. 1 Cf. Wis. Stat. 1955, § 176.35.”
Alabama Forest Prods. Indus. Workmen's Comp. Self-Insurers' Fund v. Harris, 194 So. 3d 921 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). “” Unlike Minnesota law, see Minn.Stat., § 176.35(l)(b), on which the Act is generally based, the Act does hot specifically provide compensation for nursing services provided by the family members .”
Ex parte Alabama Forest Prods. Indus. Workmen's Comp. Self-Insurers' Fund., 194 So. 3d 928 (Ala. 2014). · cites it 2× “Finally, the petitioner points out that the court in Osorio noted that Minnesota's Workers' Compensation Act, upon which Alabama's Workers' Compensation Act generally is modeled, specifically provides for the payment of nursing services performed by family members of a…”
— Minn. Stat. § 176.35(l)(b) — 2 cases
Alabama Forest Prods. Indus. Workmen's Comp. Self-Insurers' Fund v. Harris, 194 So. 3d 921 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). “” Unlike Minnesota law, see Minn.Stat., § 176.35(l)(b), on which the Act is generally based, the Act does hot specifically provide compensation for nursing services provided by the family members .”
Ex parte Alabama Forest Prods. Indus. Workmen's Comp. Self-Insurers' Fund., 194 So. 3d 928 (Ala. 2014). “Finally, the petitioner points out that the court in Osorio noted that Minnesota's Workers' Compensation Act, upon which Alabama's Workers' Compensation Act generally is modeled, specifically provides for the payment of nursing services performed by family members of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.