Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 177.21 (2026)

Citation; Fair Labor Standards Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 177.21 to 177.35 may be cited as the "Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Milner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 748 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 2008).
Milner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 748 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 9× “See Minn.Stat. § 177.21 (stating that sections 177.”
Burt v. Rackner, Inc., 902 N.W.2d 448 (Minn. 2017). · cites it 10× “d/b/a Bunny’s Bar & Grill challenges a court of appeals’ opinion reversing the dismissal of respondent Todd Burt’s complaint alleging a violation of the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (MFLSA), Minn. Stat. §§ 177.21 -.35 (2016), for Rackner’s decision to terminate him for…”
Nerland v. Caribou Coffee Co., Inc., 564 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (D. Minnesota 2007). · cites it 3× “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Minnesota State Class Plaintiffs asks this Court to certify their Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, Minn.Stat. § 177.21, et seq., claims as an opt-out class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Axelberg v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 848 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 2014). · cites it 3× “See Minn.Stat. § 177.21 (2012) ("Sections 177.”
Roble v. Celestica Corp., 627 F. Supp. 2d 1008 (D. Minnesota 2007). · cites it 2× “§§ 201-19 , the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (hereinafter “MFLSA”), Minn.Stat. § 177.21 et seq., breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.”
Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel, 562 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “See Minn. Stat. § 177.21 (Minn.Stat. § 177.21-35 may be cited as the “Minnesota fair labor standards act”).”
Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc., 788 N.W.2d 50 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 177.21 (2008). At the end of 2005, Life Time made deductions from two of Erdman’s paychecks in order to recover bonus overpayments it made to Erdman earlier in the year.”
Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, 654 F. Supp. 2d 973 (D. Minnesota 2009). · cites it 5× “(“FLSA”); the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, Minn.Stat. 177.21, et seq. (“MFLSA”); and the Minnesota Payment of Wages Act, Minn.”
Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc., 771 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “79, or do they also have a remedy under the MFLSA, Minn.Stat. §§ 177.21 to .35 (2008); and (3) if recovery is available under the MFLSA, what is the scope of that remedy.”
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc., 386 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “33: An employer who pays an employee less than the wages and overtime compensation to which the employee is entitled under sections 177.21 to 177.35 is liable to the employee for the full amount of the wages and overtime compensation, less any amount actually paid to the…”
Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, 277 F.R.D. 395 (D. Minnesota 2011). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs’ MFLSA Claim Plaintiffs have moved for class certification on their Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, Minn.Stat. § 177.21, et seq. (“MFLSA”) claim.”
Burt v. Rackner, Inc., 882 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2016). “of sections 177.21 to 177.44 directly to district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.