Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.61 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2022 · leading case: Minnesota State Bd. for Cmty. Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984).
Minnesota State Bd. for Cmty. Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984). “I A In 1971, the Minnesota Legislature adopted the Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), Minn. Stat. § 179.61 et seq. (1982), to establish "orderly and constructive relationships between all public employers and their employees.”
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979). “The arbitration panel must act in accordance with the policy guidelines set-forth [sic] in Minn.Stat. § 179.61 which states, interalia, [sic] that the purpose of the PELRA is ‘to promote orderly and constructive relationships between all public employers and their employees,…”
Hibbing Educ. Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 369 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 1985). “1982, §§ 179.61 to 179.76, as amended. See Act of April 24, 1984, ch.”
Gen. Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin Cnty. Bd., 320 N.W.2d 695 (Minn. 1982). “The PELRA of 1971, Minn.Stat. 179.61 Public Policy, provides: “It is the public policy of this state and the purpose of sections 179.”
Eisen v. State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 352 N.W.2d 731 (Minn. 1984). “See Minn. Stat. § 179.61 (1982). PELRA grants to public employees rights to organize and freely choose representatives who may be certified as the employees’ exclusive representatives.”
Knight v. Minnesota Cmty. Coll. Fac. Ass'n, 571 F. Supp. 1 (D. Minnesota 1982). “Minn.Stat. § 179.61. As the Abood Court noted, such a determination by the state is to be afforded great weight in the constitutional balance.”
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of Minneapolis, 233 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1975). “” § 179.61. The legislature therefore declared that “unique approaches to negotiations and resolutions *370 of disputes between public employees and employers are necessary.”
St. Paul Fire Fighters, Local 21 v. City of St. Paul, 336 N.W.2d 301 (Minn. 1983). “Minn.Stat. § 179.61 (1982). Nor is requiring negotiation with respect to these aspects of implementation of the OTP likely to hamper the City’s objectives.”
Cloquet Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 94, 344 N.W.2d 416 (Minn. 1984). “The union contends the school district's unilateral assignment of a teacher to chaperone a senior high dance constituted a change in the terms and conditions of his employment and that the school district was therefore obligated to meet and negotiate the matter.”
Finch v. Wemlinger, 310 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1981). “Plaintiff Calvin Finch appeals from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, dated March 21,1980, insofar as it dismissed his cause'of action for unfair labor practices under the Public Employees’ Labor Relations Act (PELRA), Minn.Stat. §§ 179.61 to 179.76 (1980), and held…”
Foley Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 51, 353 N.W.2d 917 (Minn. 1984). “51, Foley, Minnesota, and the Foley Education Association (FEA), the teachers’ exclusive bargaining agent under the Public Employment Labor Relations Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 179.61 to 179.76 (1982) (PEL-RA), appeal from a judgment of the district court denying their request for…”
State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42, 672 S.W.2d 99 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984). “1 (1975); Minn.Stat. § 179.61 (1976); Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.