Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.65 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1975–1985 · leading case: Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981).
Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981). “Prior to August 20, 1973, and as required by the 1971 version of Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 5 and the contract between AHEA and District for the time period 1972-1974, District permitted dues check off for any employee organization that a teacher designated.”
Finch v. Wemlinger, 310 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1981). “52 (1969), the predecessor to Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 1, to mean that a public employee may not be terminated for submitting a grievance.”
Minnesota State Bd. for Cmty. Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984). “Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 2 (1982). Nonmembers may, however, be required to pay a fairshare fee to the exclusive representative to cover costs related to negotiating on behalf of the entire bargaining unit.”
Knight v. Minnesota Cmty. Coll. Fac. Ass'n, 571 F. Supp. 1 (D. Minnesota 1982). “See Minn.Stat. §§ 179.65, subd. 3; 179.66, subd.”
Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984). “With respect to negotiations, Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 4 (1982), provides: Publc employees through their certified exclusive representative have the right and obligation to meet and negotiate in good faith with their employer regarding grievance procedures and the terms and…”
Washington Cty. v. AM. FED. OF STATE, ETC., 262 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 1978). “1976, § 179.65, subd. 6, a provision of this state's Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), barred the union from representing both a bargaining unit of supervisory employees and a bargaining unit of nonsupervisory employees of the Washington *165 County Welfare…”
Cnty. of Washington v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council No. 91, 262 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 1978). “1976, § 179.65, subd. 6, a provision of this state’s Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), barred the union from representing both a bargaining unit of supervisory employees and a bargaining unit of nonsu-pervisory employees of the Washington *165 County Welfare…”
Robbinsdale Educ. Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Fed'n of Teachers Local 872, 239 N.W.2d 437 (Minn. 1976). “Consequently, the act provides in § 179.65, subd. 2: “* * * [A] 11 public employees who are not members of the exclusive representative may be required by said representative to contribute a fair share fee for services rendered by the exclusive representative, and the employer…”
Threlkeld v. Robbinsdale Fed'n of Teachers, Local 872, 316 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1982). “This is an appeal from a May 6, 1981, order of the Hennepin County District Court affirming an order of the Public Employment Relations Board dated December 6, 1979, determining that appellant, a nonmember of the Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers, Local 872, was legally…”
Ass'n of Capitol Powerhouse Engineers v. State, 570 P.2d 1042 (Wash. 1977). “150E, § 12 (West); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 179.65 (West). Vermont requires payment of a fee "not exceeding union dues.”
Marshall Cnty. Cent. Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 441, 363 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “DECISION The school district’s decision not to renew Dunning’s contract was based on her submitting a grievance and was, therefore, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 1 (1982). Accordingly, we order the district to reinstate Dunning and remand to the trial court the…”
Beckman v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 241 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1976). “Defendants’ appeal from the order denying their motion *131 to dissolve the injunction and set aside the judgment entered essentially challenges the procedure followed by the trial court in reaching its decision.”
— Minn. Stat. § 179.65(2) — 1 case
Leon W. Knight v. The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, Dist. Judge, United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of Minnesota, 535 F.2d 466 (8th Cir. 1976).
— Minn. Stat. § 179.65(5) — 1 case
Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981). “Prior to August 20, 1973, and as required by the 1971 version of Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 5 and the contract between AHEA and District for the time period 1972-1974, District permitted dues check off for any employee organization that a teacher designated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.