Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179.65 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1975–1985 · leading case: Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981).
Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 42× “Prior to August 20, 1973, and as required by the 1971 version of Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 5 and the contract between AHEA and District for the time period 1972-1974, District permitted dues check off for any employee organization that a teacher designated.”
Finch v. Wemlinger, 310 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 10× “52 (1969), the predecessor to Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 1, to mean that a public employee may not be terminated for submitting a grievance.”
Minnesota State Bd. for Cmty. Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 2 (1982). Nonmembers may, however, be required to pay a fairshare fee to the exclusive representative to cover costs related to negotiating on behalf of the entire bargaining unit.”
Knight v. Minnesota Cmty. Coll. Fac. Ass'n, 571 F. Supp. 1 (D. Minnesota 1982). · cites it 6× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 179.65, subd. 3; 179.66, subd.”
Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 4× “With respect to negotiations, Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 4 (1982), provides: Publc employees through their certified exclusive representative have the right and obligation to meet and negotiate in good faith with their employer regarding grievance procedures and the terms and…”
Washington Cty. v. AM. FED. OF STATE, ETC., 262 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 13× “1976, § 179.65, subd. 6, a provision of this state's Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), barred the union from representing both a bargaining unit of supervisory employees and a bargaining unit of nonsupervisory employees of the Washington *165 County Welfare…”
Cnty. of Washington v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council No. 91, 262 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 13× “1976, § 179.65, subd. 6, a provision of this state’s Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), barred the union from representing both a bargaining unit of supervisory employees and a bargaining unit of nonsu-pervisory employees of the Washington *165 County Welfare…”
Robbinsdale Educ. Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Fed'n of Teachers Local 872, 239 N.W.2d 437 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 4× “Consequently, the act provides in § 179.65, subd. 2: “* * * [A] 11 public employees who are not members of the exclusive representative may be required by said representative to contribute a fair share fee for services rendered by the exclusive representative, and the employer…”
Threlkeld v. Robbinsdale Fed'n of Teachers, Local 872, 316 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 6× “This is an appeal from a May 6, 1981, order of the Hennepin County District Court affirming an order of the Public Employment Relations Board dated December 6, 1979, determining that appellant, a nonmember of the Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers, Local 872, was legally…”
Ass'n of Capitol Powerhouse Engineers v. State, 570 P.2d 1042 (Wash. 1977). “150E, § 12 (West); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 179.65 (West). Vermont requires payment of a fee "not exceeding union dues.”
Marshall Cnty. Cent. Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 441, 363 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “DECISION The school district’s decision not to renew Dunning’s contract was based on her submitting a grievance and was, therefore, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 179.65, subd. 1 (1982). Accordingly, we order the district to reinstate Dunning and remand to the trial court the…”
Beckman v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 241 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 3× “Defendants’ appeal from the order denying their motion *131 to dissolve the injunction and set aside the judgment entered essentially challenges the procedure followed by the trial court in reaching its decision.”
— Minn. Stat. § 179.65(2) — 1 case
— Minn. Stat. § 179.65(5) — 1 case
Anoka-Hennepin Educ. Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 305 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1981). “Prior to August 20, 1973, and as required by the 1971 version of Minn. Stat. § 179.65 , subd. 5 and the contract between AHEA and District for the time period 1972-1974, District permitted dues check off for any employee organization that a teacher designated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.