Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.66 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1975–1985 · leading case: Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984).
Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984). “The Regents argue that these issues are "inherent managerial prerogatives" and, therefore, non-negotiable under Minn.Stat. § 179.66, subd. 1 (1982). In its original action, the MEA requested declaratory and injunctive relief.”
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist, 338 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1983). “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 179.66, subd. 2 (1982), PELRA places an obligation upon public employers to negotiate "terms and conditions of employment," which in relevant part are defined, at Minn.”
Knight v. Minnesota Cmty. Coll. Fac. Ass'n, 571 F. Supp. 1 (D. Minnesota 1982). “” Minn. Stat. § 179.66 , subd. 2. Negotiated agreements with state employees and even arbitration awards must be “submitted to the legislature to be accepted or rejected.”
Gallagher v. City of Minneapolis, 364 N.W.2d 467 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “In 1983, the legislature amended Minn. Stat. § 179.66 , subd. 2, to provide that the collective bargaining duty of a public employer superseded any conflicting municipal charter.”
Minneapolis Ass'n of Administrators & Consultants v. Minneapolis Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 311 N.W.2d 474 (Minn. 1981). “Section 179.66, subdivision 4, imposes upon a public employer the obligation to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative of its supervisory employees regarding the terms and conditions of their employment.”
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local No. 320 v. City of Minneapolis, 225 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1975). “Section 179.66, subd. 2, provides: “A public employer has an obligation to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative of the public employees in an appropriate unit regarding grievance procedures and the terms and conditions of employment, but such…”
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of Minneapolis, 233 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1975). “representative of its public employees concerning terms and conditions of employment (§ 179.66, subd. 2) which include (1) hours of employment, (2) compensation therefor, and (3) the employer’s personnel policies affecting the working conditions of employees (§ 179.”
Arbitration Proceeding Between Arrowhead Pub. Serv. Union v. City of Duluth, 336 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1983). “Minn.Stat. § 179.66, subd. 1 (1982). Minneapolis Association of Administrators and Consultants v.”
Minneapolis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 59 v. Minneapolis Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 258 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 1977). “The terms in both cases are subject to the provisions of section 179.66 regarding the rights of public employers and the scope of negotiations.”
Ogilvie v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 341, 329 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 1983). “1977), and the provisions of Minn.Stat. § 179.66, subd. 1. Accordingly, the sole issue presented is whether or not Ogilvie’s part-time extra-district assignment without meeting and negotiating the criteria and procedure for such assignment constitutes an unfair labor practice…”
Minnesota Fed'n of Teachers, Local 331 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 361, 310 N.W.2d 482 (Minn. 1981). “In the Matter of Arbitration Between Ramsey County vs. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No.”
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979). “The terms in both cases are subject to the provisions of section 179.66 regarding the rights of public employers and the scope of negotiations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.