Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179.71 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Patzwald v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 306 N.W.2d 118 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Patzwald v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 306 N.W.2d 118 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 12× “PELRA provides that the Director of BMS is authorized to determine the appropriate bargaining unit pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 179.71, subd. 3 (1980), which provides in pertinent part that: The director shall determine appropriate units, except where appropriate units are defined…”

Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 621 v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 268 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “17: “ ‘Appropriate unit’ or ‘unit’ means a unit of employees, excluding supervisory employees, confidential employees and principals and assistant principals, as determined pursuant to section 179.71, subdivision 3, and in the case of school districts, the term means all the…”

Hibbing Educ. Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 346 N.W.2d 389 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “PERB contends that a determination based on actual job functions is not the type of determination which is within the jurisdiction of BMS or PERB under Minn. Stat. § 179.71 (1980), or Minn.Stat.”

Anoka Cnty., Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enf't Labor Servs., Inc., Brooklyn Ctr., Minnesota (Minn. 2024). · cites it 15× “at 2725 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 179.71 , subd. 3 (1972)). In this amendment, the Legislature affirmatively eliminated the express reference to “the efficient administration of government,” added the language “the desires of the employees and employers” and changed the plural…”

Anoka Cnty., Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enf't Labor Servs., Inc., Brooklyn Ctr., Minnesota, ... (Minn. 2024). · cites it 13× “at 2725 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 179.71 , subd. 3 (1972)). In this amendment, the Legislature affirmatively eliminated the express reference to “the efficient administration of government,” added the language “the desires of the employees and employers” and changed the plural…”

Jacobson v. Dir., Bureau of Mediation Servs., 508 F. Supp. 715 (D. Minnesota 1981). · cites it 2× “The defendant, Director, is charged with the responsibility for determining appropriate bargaining units and exclusive representatives for public employees in Minnesota, Minn.Stat. § 179.71 subd. 2 (1980). All interested persons were provided an opportunity to present testimony…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.