Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.052 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1991 c 246 s 69]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1993 · leading case: Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 494 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 494 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 5× “Who has the burden of proving a provider’s costs are allowable under 12 MCAR § 2.052? II. Is the department estopped from disallowing the providers’ expenses? III.”

White Bear Lake Care Ctr., Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 319 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. 1982). “” 12 MCAR § 2.052 B.l.c(i)(j). Second, the recoupment provision by its terms applies when known cost changes “do not in fact occur.”

Contested Case of REM, Inc. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 382 N.W.2d 539 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The facilities’ per diem welfare rates for 1981 and 1982 are governed by 12 MCAR § 2.052 (Rule 52) (1981). 1 Under this rule welfare rates for established facilities are *541 redetermined annually and are generally calculated on the basis of the facilities’ historical costs, as…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.