Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 20.37 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 18.432]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Kismet Investors, Inc. v. Cnty. of Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kismet Investors, Inc. v. Cnty. of Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “2d 371, 373-74 (1997) (affirming variance because razing heavy fortress-like building for alternative uses cost prohibitive); see generally Young, supra, § 20.37. The board reasonably concluded that Kismet’s plight was not unique to the land.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.