Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 203.38 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1975 c 5 s 135]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1962–2009 · leading case: Lundquist v. Leonard, 652 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 2002).
Lundquist v. Leonard, 652 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 2002). “We noted in Parsons that section 203.38, subdivision 1 (1971), the predecessor of section 204B.”
Rolvaag v. Donovan, 119 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1962). “Thereafter a petition was submitted to this court under § 203.38 in behalf of Andersen, seeking to compel the state canvassing board to accept the amended returns as part of their tabulations.”
In Re Application of Andersen, 264 Minn. 257 (Minn. 1962). “Thereafter a petition was submitted to this court under § 203.38 in behalf of Andersen, seeking to compel the state canvassing board to accept the amended returns as part of their tabulations.”
In Re Candidacy of Daly, 200 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. 1972). “Hickey, county auditor of Hennepin County, questioning whether the above named individuals, or any of them, are eligible to file for or to hold the office for which they seek to have their names on the ballots in the November 1972 general election, we issued our order to show…”
Moe v. Alsop, 180 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1970). “” An order to show cause was issued by the Chief Justice, directed to the respondent auditor, pursuant to § 203.38, returnable on August 24, 1970. Respondent auditor by affidavit disclosed that Gladys Baker Swanson had filed her “Affidavit of Candidate for Nomination Without…”
Peterson v. Knutson, 233 N.W.2d 716 (Minn. 1975). “The Secretary of State initiated proceedings pursuant to Minn. Stat. §203.38 , subd. 1 (1971), to resolve the question of whether Peterson’s disbarment precluded him from candidacy under the provisions of Minn.”
Peterson v. Knutson, 233 N.W.2d 716 (Minn. 1975). “That opinion stated: "A brief survey of the underlying facts of the case reveals that appellant is a disbarred attorney who sought placement on the ballot for the November 1972 general election as a candidate for the Minnesota Supreme Court.”
Parsons v. Hickey, 201 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1972). “In a similar proceeding under § 203.38, subd. 1, prior to the primary election, we issued our order to show cause why the name of respondent should not be omitted from the ballot at the primary election.”
Mattson v. McKenna, 222 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1974). “may work to the advantage of candidate Loehr, determination of that fact would require this court to take judicial notice that the association of a candidate’s name with an incumbent governor or with some of the candidates endorsed by a political convention, though not so…”
Coleman v. Ritchie, 762 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 2009). “§ 203.38 (1961), the predecessor to section 204B.”
— Minn. Stat. § 203.38(d) — 2 cases
Rolvaag v. Donovan, 119 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1962). “Thereafter a petition was submitted to this court under § 203.38 in behalf of Andersen, seeking to compel the state canvassing board to accept the amended returns as part of their tabulations.”
In Re Application of Andersen, 264 Minn. 257 (Minn. 1962). “Thereafter a petition was submitted to this court under § 203.38 in behalf of Andersen, seeking to compel the state canvassing board to accept the amended returns as part of their tabulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.