Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 210A.38 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1988 c 578 art 2 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Menkevich v. Lefebvre, 303 N.W.2d 462 (Minn. 1981).
Menkevich v. Lefebvre, 303 N.W.2d 462 (Minn. 1981). “02; that the violation was serious, deliberate, and material; that Minn. Stat. § 210A.38 (1980) would not prevent forfeiture of office; and that the Anoka County Auditor should revoke appellant’s certificate of election.”
Scheibel v. Pavlak, 282 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. 1979). “04) and, second, that "The claimed offense did not arise from want of good faith and under the circumstances, it would be unjust that Robert Pavlak should forfeit his office" (§ 210A.38). This court's majority has substituted its findings for those of the trial judge relating to…”
Pavlak v. Growe, 284 N.W.2d 174 (Minn. 1979). “Contestee, Robert Pavlak, committed a deliberate, serious and material violation of the provisions of the Minnesota Election Law not excused by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 210A.38. “2. Robert Pavlak was not legally elected and is not entitled to retain the seat…”
Matter of Contest of Election in Del Primary, 344 N.W.2d 826 (Minn. 1984). “Accordingly, candidates will have a most difficult time claiming good faith under section 210A.38 if violations similar to those presently under consideration occur hereafter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.