Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 211.34 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 675 art 13 s 1]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1953–1971 · leading case: Bank v. Egan, 60 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. 1953).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bank v. Egan, 60 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. 1953). “Likewise, § 211.34 contains the provision that an election shall not be avoided where the offenses complained of are trivial or unimportant or where the “act or omission of any candidate complained of arose from accidental miscalculation or from some other reasonable cause of…”

Moulton v. Newton, 144 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. 1966). “” 6 *549 In determining the merit of contestant’s claims the trial court may find, pursuant to § 211.34, that from the evidence it appears— “* * * the offenses complained of were trivial or unimportant * * * [and] arose from accidental miscalculations or from some other…”

Barthel v. Zachman, 185 N.W.2d 277 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 3× “04, advanced the trial of the contest and, with the agreement of the parties, limited evidence to the issue of contestee’s participation, in recognition that such was the narrow issue raised by contestee’s denial and that § 211.34 2 of the Fair Campaign Practices Act does not…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.