Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 216.24 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1983 c 247 s 219]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1946–1984 · leading case: Cnty. of Ramsey v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 N.W.2d 740 (Minn. 1984).
Cnty. of Ramsey v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 N.W.2d 740 (Minn. 1984). “25 (1982) provides: "Any party to a proceeding before the commission or the attorney general may make and perfect an appeal from such order as provided in sections 216.24 and 216.25." When appellants took their appeals to district court in April through June of 1982, they…”
J. L. Shiely Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R., 91 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 1958). “On October 1, 1957, the district court ordered a dismissal of Shiely's appeal on the grounds that it had neither been a party to the proceeding nor a party affected by the commission's order within the meaning of § 216.24, and that it was improperly and unlawfully before the…”
Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co., 180 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. 1970). “0426 of the Administrative Procedure Act in 1963, the scope of judicial review of orders of the commission, as well as the procedural requirements for perfecting an appeal to the district court, was governed by §§ 216.24 and 216.25. Without reviewing the host of cases which have…”
Minneapolis Street Ry. Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 86 N.W.2d 657 (Minn. 1957). “25 provides that such findings of fact shall be prima facie evidence of all matters therein, and the burden of proof upon all issues raised by the appeal shall be on the appellant.”
State ex rel. Spannaus v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 304 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. 1981). “Minn.Stat. § 216.24 (1980) provides that any party to a proceeding before the Department of Public Service, any party affected by an order thereof, or the state, by the attorney general, may appeal therefrom within 30 days after service of a copy of the order on the parties of…”
City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Transit Co., 133 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. 1965). “24, which so far as applicable here provide: "Any party to a proceeding before the commission, or any party affected by any order thereof, or the State of Minnesota, by the attorney general, may appeal therefrom to the district court of the county in which the complainants, or a…”
State v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 246 N.W.2d 28 (Minn. 1976). “152, § 22, and applicable specifically to judicial review of commission orders in telephone rate proceedings, provides in pertinent part as follows: “Any party to a proceeding before the department or the attorney general may make and perfect an appeal from such order as…”
Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 190 N.W.2d 661 (Minn. 1971). “1969, § 216.24, and Minn. St. 216.25. No further evidence was submitted to the district court, and the matter was decided on the basis of oral argu *243 ment, briefs, and the record made before the Public Service Commission.”
State & Port Auth. v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 22 N.W.2d 569 (Minn. 1946). “On, May 17, 1945, they appealed therefrom to the district court of Eamsey county, as provided by §§ 216.24 and 216.25 (§§ 4650, 4651). On May 18, 1945, they moved said court for an order staying the effect of the commission’s order pending the appeal.”
Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc., 101 F. Supp. 978 (D. Minnesota 1952). “25 Appeal; orders not appealed; proceedings “Tile person serving such notice of appeal shall, within five days after the service thereof, file the same with proof of service, with the clerk of the court to which such appeal is taken; and thereupon the district court shall have…”
Chicago & North W. Ry. Co. v. City of Rochester, 331 F. Supp. 47 (D. Minnesota 1971). “§ 216.24 provides, “Any party to a proceeding before the commission, or any party affected by any order thereof * * * may appeal therefrom to the district court of the county in which the complainants, or a majority of them, reside * * * at any time within 30 days after service…”
St. Paul City Ry. Co. v. City of St. Paul, 64 N.W.2d 487 (Minn. 1954). “15, as far as material, reads: “Any city or street railway may appeal from any order, ruling, or decision of the commission duly made after hearing to the district court of the county in which the city affected by any such order, ruling, or decision is located, and the appeal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.