Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 216B. PUBLIC UTILITIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 216B.66 (2026)

Construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws 1974, chapter 429 is complete in itself and other Minnesota statutes are not to be construed as applicable to the supervision or regulation of public utilities by the commission. All acts and parts of acts in conflict with Laws 1974, chapter 429 are repealed insofar as they pertain to the regulation of public utilities as defined herein.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–1999 · leading case: N. States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale, 588 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
N. States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale, 588 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “16 (1996) (asserting that legislative intent may be determined by the occasion and necessity for the law, and the object to be attained); Minn.Stat. § 216B.66 (1996) (declaring that the MPUA is complete in itself, and that other statutes are inapplicable to the regulation of…”
In Re Petition by the City of Rochester, 478 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 216B.66 (1990). Accordingly, the city’s alleged right to serve the street lights, based upon Minn.”
City of Rochester v. People's Coop. Power Ass'n, 466 N.W.2d 753 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “47 conflicts with Minn.Stat. § 216B.66, which provides that chapter 216B is “complete in itself,” and other statutes which conflict with chapter 216B “are repealed insofar as they pertain to the regulation of public utilities as defined herein.”
Rochester v. People's Co-op. Power Ass'n, 466 N.W.2d 753 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “47 conflicts with Minn.Stat. § 216B.66, which provides that chapter 216B is "complete in itself," and other statutes which conflict with chapter 216B "are repealed insofar as they pertain to the regulation of public utilities as defined herein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.