Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 216B.684 (2026)

Environmental Assessment Of Mercury Emissions-Reduction Plan

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Pollution Control Agency shall evaluate a utility's mercury emissions-reduction plans filed under sections 216B.682 and 216B.6851 and submit its evaluation to the Public Utilities Commission within 180 days of the date the plan is filed with the agency and commission. In its review, the agency shall (1) assess whether the utility's plan meets the requirements of section 216B.682 or 216B.6851, as applicable, (2) evaluate the environmental and public health benefits of each option proposed or considered by the utility, including benefits associated with reductions in pollutants other than mercury, (3) assess the technical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of technologies proposed or considered by the utility for achieving mercury emissions reduction, and (4) advise the commission of the appropriateness of the utility's plan. In preparing its assessment, the agency may request additional information from the utility, especially with regard to alternative technologies or configurations applicable to the specific unit, and the estimated costs of those alternatives.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2014 · leading case: In Re N. States Power Co., 775 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re N. States Power Co., 775 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “” Minn. Stat. § 216B.684. Following the MPCA evaluation, MPUC “shall review and evaluate a utility’s mercury emissions-reduction plant ]” considering “the environmental and public health benefits, the agency’s assessment of technical feasibility, competitiveness of customer…”
In the Matter of Minnesota Power's Petitions for Approval of its Boswell Energy Ctr. Unit 4 Env't Retrofit Proj. & Boswell 4 Env't Improvement Rider. (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “6851], (2) evaluate the environmental and public health benefits of each option proposed or considered by the utility, including benefits associated with reductions in pollutants other than mercury, (3) assess the technical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of technologies…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.