Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 216E.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 216I.21]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2015 · leading case: Great River Energy v. David D. Swedzinski, 860 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Great River Energy v. David D. Swedzinski, 860 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 2015). · cites it 22× “The question presented in this case is whether the district court, when approving a landowner’s election to require a public utility to condemn a parcel of property in fee under Minn.Stat. § 216E.12, subd. 4 (2014) (“Buy-the-Farm statute”), must consider factors other than those…”

N. States Power Co. ex rel. Bd. of Directors v. Aleckson, 831 N.W.2d 303 (Minn. 2013). · cites it 39× “This case presents the question of whether property owners who elect to require a utility to condemn their property in fee under Minn.Stat. § 216E.12 (2012) are entitled to minimum compensation under *305 Minn.”

N. States Power Co. ex rel. Bd. of Directors v. Aleckson, 819 N.W.2d 709 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 28× “Respondents exercised their option under Minn.Stat. § 216E.12, subd. 4, otherwise known as the “Buy-the-Farm” statute, to require appellants to acquire a fee interest in their entire parcels.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.