Minn. Stat. § 221.171

Compensation Of Household Goods Carrier Fixed

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Compensation fixed by schedule on file.

A household goods mover must not charge or receive a greater, lesser, or different compensation for the transportation or service provided than the rates and charges specified in the tariff under section 221.161. A household goods mover must not refund or remit in any manner or by any device, directly or indirectly, the rates and charges required to be collected by the mover under the mover's schedules.

Subd. 2.Exemptions.

(a) A person engaged in the transportation of household goods for the federal government or an agency of the federal government or the transportation of household goods for the state government or an agency of the state government where competitive bids are required by law is exempt from subdivision 1.

(b) A person engaged in the transportation of household goods at the request of a nonprofit charitable organization that qualifies for tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code is exempt from subdivision 1 when the transportation is in furtherance of the organization's charitable purpose. A person engaged in the transportation of household goods for a charitable organization may conduct the transportation statewide.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1998 · leading case: A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools (1998) minnctapp · cites it 8× “Subdivision 1 states that: No permit carrier shall charge or receive a greater, lesser, or different compensation for the transportation of persons or property or for related service, than the rates and charges named in the carrier's schedule on file and in effect with the…”

Central Distribution Carriers, Inc. v. Mrs. Gerry's Kitchen, Inc. (1994) minnctapp · cites it 4× “The carrier seeks damages equal to the difference between the filed rates and the contracted rates, along with prejudgment interest. ISSUE Did the district court err in granting equitable relief in an action to enforce filed rates? ANALYSIS In Minnesota, permit carriers are…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.