Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 246B.10 (2026)

Liability Of County; Reimbursement

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The civilly committed sex offender's county shall pay to the state a portion of the cost of care provided in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program to a civilly committed sex offender who has legally settled in that county.

(b) A county's payment must be made from the county's own sources of revenue and payments must:

(1) equal ten percent of the cost of care, as determined by the executive board, for each day or portion of a day that the civilly committed sex offender spends at the facility for individuals admitted to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program before August 1, 2011; or

(2) equal 25 percent of the cost of care, as determined by the executive board, for each day or portion of a day that the civilly committed sex offender:

(i) spends at the facility for individuals admitted to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program on or after August 1, 2011; or

(ii) receives services within a program operated by the Minnesota Sex Offender Program while on provisional discharge.

(c) The county is responsible for paying the state the remaining amount if payments received by the state under this chapter exceed:

(1) 90 percent of the cost of care for individuals admitted to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program before August 1, 2011; or

(2) 75 percent of the cost of care for individuals:

(i) admitted to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program on or after August 1, 2011; or

(ii) receiving services within a program operated by the Minnesota Sex Offender Program while on provisional discharge.

(d) The county is not entitled to reimbursement from the civilly committed sex offender, the civilly committed sex offender's estate, or from the civilly committed sex offender's relatives, except as provided in section 246B.07.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Eugene C. Banks v. Dakota Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Minn. Ct. App. 2023).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Eugene C. Banks v. Dakota Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.10(a). Under the statute, MSOP is exclusively responsible for providing services to Banks as a committed SDP.”

— Minn. Stat. § 246B.10(a) — 1 case

Eugene C. Banks v. Dakota Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.10(a). Under the statute, MSOP is exclusively responsible for providing services to Banks as a committed SDP.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.