Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 253A.18 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1982 c 581 s 25]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1981–1992 · leading case: K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981).
K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “Minn.Stat. § 253A.18(1) (1980) (commitment not a judicial determination of incompetency).”
Matter of Blilie, 484 N.W.2d 34 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “Further, Minn.Stat. § 253A.18, subd. 2 (1967) authorized the commencement of guardianship proceedings "before, during, or after commitment proceedings," and provided that such proceedings "may be conducted jointly with such commitment proceedings.”
Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “Thus, their claims do not come within the original constitutional jurisdiction of the probate court. When the "restoration to capacity" cases were decided many years ago, the law in Minnesota equated commitment for mental illness with legal incompetence and guardianship.”
— Minn. Stat. § 253A.18(1) — 2 cases
K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “Minn.Stat. § 253A.18(1) (1980) (commitment not a judicial determination of incompetency).”
Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “Thus, their claims do not come within the original constitutional jurisdiction of the probate court. When the "restoration to capacity" cases were decided many years ago, the law in Minnesota equated commitment for mental illness with legal incompetence and guardianship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.