Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 253A.19 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1982 c 581 s 25]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1981 · leading case: K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 38× “In 1980, he petitioned the Anoka County Probate Court for a change of commitment status under Minn.Stat. § 253A.19 (1980), alleging that he no longer had a psychopathic personality.”

Welsch v. Likins, 373 F. Supp. 487 (D. Minnesota 1974). “Furthermore, a released person remains “subject to supervision and return to custody” until unconditionally discharged.”

Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 38× “In 1980, he petitioned the Anoka County Probate Court for a change of commitment status under Minn.Stat. § 253A.19 (1980), alleging that he no longer had a psychopathic personality.”

— Minn. Stat. § 253A.19(1) — 2 cases

K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “In 1980, he petitioned the Anoka County Probate Court for a change of commitment status under Minn.Stat. § 253A.19 (1980), alleging that he no longer had a psychopathic personality.”

Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “In 1980, he petitioned the Anoka County Probate Court for a change of commitment status under Minn.Stat. § 253A.19 (1980), alleging that he no longer had a psychopathic personality.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.