Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 253B.12 (2026)

Treatment Report; Review; Hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Reports.

(a) If a patient who was committed as a person who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, is discharged from commitment within the first 60 days after the date of the initial commitment order, the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall file a written report with the committing court describing the patient's need for further treatment. A copy of the report must be provided to the county attorney, the patient, and the patient's counsel.

(b) If a patient who was committed as a person who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, remains in treatment more than 60 days after the date of the commitment, then at least 60 days, but not more than 90 days, after the date of the order, the head of the facility or program that has custody of the patient shall file a written report with the committing court and provide a copy to the county attorney, the patient, and the patient's counsel. The report must set forth in detailed narrative form at least the following:

(1) the diagnosis of the patient with the supporting data;

(2) the anticipated discharge date;

(3) an individualized treatment plan;

(4) a detailed description of the discharge planning process with suggested after care plan;

(5) whether the patient is in need of further care and treatment, the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program that is needed, and evidence to support the response;

(6) whether the patient satisfies the statutory requirement for continued commitment with documentation to support the opinion;

(7) a statement from the patient related to accepting treatment, if possible; and

(8) whether the administration of neuroleptic medication is clinically indicated, whether the patient is able to give informed consent to that medication, and the basis for these opinions.

(c) Prior to the termination of the initial commitment order or final discharge of the patient, the head of the facility or program that has custody or care of the patient shall file a written report with the committing court with a copy to the county attorney, the patient, and the patient's counsel that sets forth the information required in paragraph (b).

(d) If the patient has been provisionally discharged from a facility or program, the report shall be filed by the designated agency, which may submit the discharge report as part of its report.

(e) If a report describes the patient as not in need of further court-ordered treatment, the proceedings must be terminated by the committing court and the patient discharged from the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program, unless the patient chooses to voluntarily receive services.

(f) If no written report is filed within the required time, the court must notify the county, facility or program to which the person is committed, and designated agency and require a report be filed within five business days. If a report is not filed within five business days a hearing must be held within three business days.

Subd. 2.

MS 2018 [Repealed, 1Sp2020 c 2 art 6 s 124]

Subd. 2a.Time and place for hearing.

(a) Unless the proceedings are terminated under subdivision 1, paragraph (e), a review hearing must be held within 14 days after receipt by the committing court of the report required under subdivision 1, paragraph (c) or (d), and before the time the commitment expires. For good cause shown, the court may continue the hearing for up to an additional 14 days and extend any orders until the review hearing is held.

(b) The patient, the patient's counsel, the petitioner, and other persons as the court directs must be given at least five days' notice of the time and place of the hearing. The hearing may be conducted by interactive video conference under General Rules of Practice, rule 131, and Minnesota Rules of Civil Commitment, rule 14.

Subd. 3.Examination.

Prior to the review hearing, the court shall inform the patient of the right to an independent examination by a court examiner chosen by the patient and appointed in accordance with provisions of section 253B.07, subdivision 3. The report of the court examiner may be submitted at the hearing.

Subd. 4.Hearing; standard of proof.

(a) The committing court shall not make a final determination of the need to continue commitment unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the patient continues to have a mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency; (2) involuntary commitment is necessary for the protection of the patient or others; and (3) there is no alternative to involuntary commitment.

(b) In determining whether a patient continues to require commitment due to mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency, the court need not find that there has been a recent attempt or threat to physically harm self or others, or a recent failure to provide necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care. Instead, the court must find that the patient is likely to attempt to physically harm self or others, or to fail to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care unless involuntary commitment is continued.

Subd. 5.

[Repealed, 1997 c 217 art 1 s 118]

Subd. 6.Waiver.

A patient, after consultation with counsel, may waive any hearing under this section or section 253B.13 in writing. The waiver shall be signed by the patient and counsel. The waiver must be submitted to the committing court.

Subd. 7.Record required.

Where continued commitment is ordered, the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall specifically state the conduct of the proposed patient which is the basis for the final determination, that the statutory criteria of commitment continue to be met, and that less restrictive alternatives have been considered and rejected by the court. Reasons for rejecting each alternative shall be stated. A copy of the final order for continued commitment shall be forwarded to the head of the facility or program to which the person is committed and, if the patient has been provisionally discharged, to the designated agency responsible for monitoring the provisional discharge.

Subd. 8.

[Repealed, 1997 c 217 art 1 s 118]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Matter of Harhut, 385 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. 1986).
Matter of Harhut, 385 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 30× “The review hearing required by Minn. Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 4 was scheduled for April 30, 1985, but, on Harhut’s motion, was continued until May 21, 1985.”
In Re Thulin, 660 N.W.2d 140 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 12× “The day before this court’s opinion was released, a review hearing was held to determine the need for appellant’s continued commitment pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 4. The district court received testimony from two expert witnesses at the review hearing.”
Matter of Fredrickson, 388 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 28× “See Minn.Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 4. Prior to the hearing, Fredrickson’s attorney filed a motion with the court, challenging the constitutionality of Fredrickson’s commitment under Minn.”
In Re McCaskill, 603 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 6× “On February 23, 1999, while the appeal was pending, appellant’s case manager filed a 180-day report with the district court recommending that appellant’s commitment terminate because he no longer satisfied the criteria for commitment.”
Matter of Adams, 352 N.W.2d 117 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 14× “Minn.Stat. § 253B.12 (1982 and Supp.1983).”
Matter of Wicks, 364 N.W.2d 844 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “7 (1984); 3) Hennepin County to file a treatment report pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 1, emphasizing progress made toward community placement; and 4) either party may move for an order to' show cause for contempt directed at the employees or supervisors who submit the…”
Matter of Blilie, 494 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253B.12, a hearing was held in 1984 on the continued commitment of Blilie as a mentally retarded person.”
In Re Brown, 627 N.W.2d 113 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 12× “On October 30, 2000, more than six months from the original order of commitment but less than six months from the order revoking the stay, AMRTC filed a treatment report with the district court pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 1 (2000), recommending the continuation of…”
In Re Robledo, 611 N.W.2d 67 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “At a review hearing the following December, the court continued Robledo’s commitment through September 30, 1999, under Minn.Stat. §§ 253B.12, .13 (1998). On September 29, 1999, one day before Robledo’s commitment was due to expire, Hennepin County and AMRTC (petitioners) filed…”
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Stewart, 352 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “ISSUE Did the trial court properly continue Stewart’s commitment to Anoka State Hospital? ANALYSIS "Minn. Stat. § 253B.12, subd. 4 (Supp. 1983) provides that commitment may be continued if, after a hearing, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the person…”
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: Cordie, 372 N.W.2d 24 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. §§ 253B.12, subd. 4 and 253B.13, subd.”
Cnty. of Hennepin v. Levine, 345 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 2× “13 (duration of continued treatment for all committed individuals except MID patients); section 253B.12, subd. 8 (transfer to informal status procedural for all committed individuals except MID patients); section 253B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.