Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.015 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 111 cases, 1962–2016 · leading case: State v. Behl, 564 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Behl, 564 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1997). · cites it 60× “Before embarking on a constitutional analysis of Minn.Stat. § 260.015, therefore, we must determine whether the statute provides the district court with jurisdiction to sentence juveniles convicted exclusively of a crime, or crimes, other than those enumerated for automatic…”

In Re the Welfare of A.D., 535 N.W.2d 643 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 12× “was adjudicated a child in need of protection or services (CHIPS) pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 2a(8) (1994), 1 based on D.”

In Re the Welfare of S.A.V., 392 N.W.2d 260 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 18× “were adjudicated dependent children pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 6(d) (1984). The parents appeal, challenging the adjudication of dependency and the dispositional order.”

In Re the Welfare of J.W., 391 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 14× “, then 1-½ years, dependent and neglected children under Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subds. 6(d) and 10(b) (1984) and transferring custody of the children to the county under Minn.”

State Ex Rel. L.E.A. v. Hammergren, 294 N.W.2d 705 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 12× “At separate times, the juveniles were each charged with being wayward and habitually disobedient within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 260.015 (1978). Thereafter, they were each charged with constructive contempt of court under Minn.”

In Re the Welfare of B.A.B., 572 N.W.2d 776 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 20× “A parent challenges the district court’s determination that her child is in need of protective services (CHIPS) as lacking necessary education under Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 2a(3) (1996).”

Matter of Welfare of TK, 475 N.W.2d 88 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 20× “, challenge the trial court's determination that the children were in need of protective services (CHIPS) and needed to be removed from the home pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 260.015 and 260.191 (1988).”

In Re the Welfare of C.K., 426 N.W.2d 842 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 12× “, their two youngest children who in 1982 had been adjudged dependent and neglected pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 10(e) and who ever since had been in foster homes.”

In Re the Welfare of J.J.B., 390 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 6× “was adjudicated a “dependent child” under Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 6(d) (1978): a child “[w]ho is without proper parental care because of the emotional, mental, or physical disability, or state of immaturity of his parent, guardian, or other custodian.”

In Re the Welfare of M.G., 407 N.W.2d 118 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 9× “oster care” is defined as a child “(a) Who has been placed in foster care by court order; and (b) Whose parents’ circumstances, condition, or conduct are such that the child cannot be returned to them; and (c) Whose parents, despite the availability of needed rehabilitative…”

State v. Burg, 648 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 6× “, we interpreted Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 19 (1984), 4 which defined the juvenile offense of habitual truancy.”

State v. Reed, 737 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 3× “Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 2 (1969). A “minor” was defined as an individual under 21 years of age.”

Show all 111 citing cases →

— Minn. Stat. § 260.015(10)(a) — 1 case

In Re the Welfare of A.K.K., 356 N.W.2d 337 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).

— Minn. Stat. § 260.015(10)(b) — 1 case

In Re the Welfare of S.N.T.R., 403 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).

— Minn. Stat. § 260.015(14) — 1 case

In re the Welfare of G.S., 352 N.W.2d 511 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).

— Minn. Stat. § 260.015(6)(d) — 3 cases

In Re the Welfare of J.J.B., 369 N.W.2d 593 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).

In Re the Welfare of P.J.K., 356 N.W.2d 69 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).

In re the Welfare of A.C., 373 N.W.2d 611 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.