Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.211 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1968–2001 · leading case: In Re the Welfare of K.A.A., 410 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Welfare of K.A.A., 410 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “, Minn.Stat. §§ 260.211 and 260.215 (1986).”
Matter of Welfare of Solomon, 291 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “2d 854, 857 (1976) (interpreting Minn.Stat. § 260.211(b)(5) (1978) (If circumstances show that natural father “is, or within a foreseeable time will be, able to provide the type of care” that his daughter requires, his parental rights should not be terminated).”
In Re the Welfare of C.D.L., 306 N.W.2d 819 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 4× “609 and Minn.Stat. § 260.211 (1980), it is improper to impeach a witness with juvenile adjudications, even a witness in a juvenile court proceeding.”
State v. Spann, 574 N.W.2d 47 (Minn. 1998). · cites it 2× “” 6 The *52 rule reflects the policy of Minn.Stat. § 260.211 (1996), defining juvenile adjudications as noncriminal and protecting juvenile adjudications from disclosure.”
State v. Sandberg, 406 N.W.2d 506 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 260.211 , subd. 1 (1986). In addition, Rule 609(d) of the Minnesota Rules of Evidence generally precludes the use of juvenile adjudications for impeachment purposes; when a defendant does wish to use juvenile adjudications to impeach the credibility of a witness,…”
State v. Whaley, 389 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Under Minn.Stat. § 260.211 (1984), disclosure of juvenile records is strictly limited.”
United States v. Njb, a Male Juv., 104 F.3d 630 (4th Cir. 1997). “040 (Michie 1990); Minn.Stat. Ann. § 260.211 (West 1992); Miss.”
State v. Leonard, 336 N.W.2d 271 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.211 (1982) provides: Subdivision 1.”
State v. Little, 423 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.211, subd. 1 (1986). In addition, Minn.”
Zerby v. Brown, 160 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1968). “We accordingly declare our continued opinion that parental rights of only one person may properly be terminated in a proceeding brought under § 260.211 for purposes of adoption. Brown objected, in any event, to conducting any hearing on the adoption petition at the same time as…”
Dennis & Susan Derheim v. Hennepin Cnty. Welfare Bd., Dep't of Cmty. Servs., 688 F.2d 66 (8th Cir. 1982). “Code § 27-16-21; Minn.Stat. § 260.211, subd. 1. Hearing Officer Lunde concluded: 4.”
State v. Dugan, 211 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 2× ““The disposition of the child or any evidence given by the child in the juvenile court shall not be admissible as evidence *376 against him in any case or proceeding in any other court * * § 260.211, subd. 1. 3. He is not disqualified from future civil service examination,…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 260.211(b)(5) — 1 case
Matter of Welfare of Solomon, 291 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. 1980). “2d 854, 857 (1976) (interpreting Minn.Stat. § 260.211(b)(5) (1978) (If circumstances show that natural father “is, or within a foreseeable time will be, able to provide the type of care” that his daughter requires, his parental rights should not be terminated).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.