Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.251 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1965–2003 · leading case: In Re the Welfare of M.J.M., 416 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Welfare of M.J.M., 416 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 30× “'s parents pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 260.251 , subd. 1 (1984), which assigns financial responsibility for some court-ordered placements.”
Cnty. of Ramsey v. Wilson, 526 N.W.2d 384 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 16× “2b (1990) and Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1(b) (1990 & 1992).”
Beltrami Cnty. v. Goodman, 427 N.W.2d 662 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 10× “In this case we decide whether a minor’s wrongful death settlement is available as income or resources under Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1(b) to reimburse a county for foster care provided to the minor.”
In Re the Welfare of M.F., 473 N.W.2d 367 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 10× “In this consolidated appeal, Anoka County challenges the trial court’s finding that minor settlement funds are not resources attributable to the children within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1(b) (Supp.1989).”
In Re the Welfare of J.M.F., 381 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 16× “Did the trial court abuse its discretion in ordering appellant to reimburse the county under Minn.Stat. § 260.251 for care provided to her child? 2.”
In Re the Welfare of A.L.G., 397 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 10× “The county contends that Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1 requires reimbursement in this case.”
Strandberg v. Strandberg, 664 N.W.2d 887 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Just as the adoption subsidy is considered a resource of the child for purposes of reimbursing the county for out-of-home placement, the adoption subsidy is a resource of the child for purposes of determining child support.”
In Re the Welfare of J.S.D., 400 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 6× “The county contends that Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1 (1986) mandates reimbursement in this case.”
In Re the Welfare of S.G., 390 N.W.2d 336 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Although Minn.Stat. § 260.251 does not require application of the child support guidelines in ordering the reimbursement of foster care expenses, it is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to look to the guidelines for guidance in setting a reasonable figure.”
In Re the Welfare of M.B.P., 473 N.W.2d 389 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “1988), the supreme court held that a minor’s wrongful death settlement fund is available as income or resources under Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1(b) (1986) to reimburse a county for foster care services provided to a minor.”
In Re Spencer, 182 B.R. 263 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 1995). “In that case, the debtors’ obligation arose under Minn.Stat. § 260.251, which required that “public costs” incurred in connection with the county’s care of a minor child be reimbursed by parents or the minor child.”
In Re Carlson, 176 B.R. 890 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995). · cites it 12× “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.251, the juvenile court’s order of June 27,1991, required Ramsey County Support and Collections Department to conduct a financial investigation, and to report back to the court for the purpose of establishing the Carlsons’ responsibility for…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.