Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.291 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1969–1997 · leading case: In Re the Welfare of K. P. H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Welfare of K. P. H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 4× “The juvenile argues that the court’s refusal to consider the juvenile’s confession at the reference hearing is not an appealable order because it is not “final” and the state is not an “aggrieved party” since it prevailed below, that is, the state’s motion for certification as…”
In Re the Welfare of S. V., 296 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 4× “Appeals of juvenile court orders are permitted by Minn.Stat. § 260.291 (1978). It was held in In re Welfare of C.”
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B., 390 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.291 (1984). More to the point, the argument does not address the propriety of the determination in November of 1979 that J.”
In Re the Welfare of D.B., 463 N.W.2d 301 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 6× “” Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 1 (1988); Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of J.H.C., 384 N.W.2d 599 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 1 (1984). Appellant asserts this statutory rule on appeals of juvenile cases is superceded by a juvenile court rule.”
State v. Anderson, 394 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.291 *816 (1984). Appellant failed to appeal the order and therefore cannot attack the validity of the reference in this proceeding.”
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M., 372 N.W.2d 431 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Under Minn.Stat. § 260.291 (1982), a person may appeal “from a final order affecting a substantial right of the aggrieved person, including but not limited to an order adjudging a child to be dependent, [or] neglected * * ” The question then becomes was the trial court’s order…”
In Re the Welfare of R.I., 402 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “She appeals an order of the juvenile court issued in a dependency action pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.291 (1984), placing one child with her father, dismissing the proceeding as to the other two children, and transferring jurisdiction as to these children to the Tribal Court for…”
In Re the Welfare of R.M., 436 N.W.2d 807 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “DECISION Appeals in juvenile court matters are governed by Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 1 (1988), which provides: Subdivision 1.”
In Re the Welfare of D.K., 363 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “, Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 2(b) (1982) (“The appeal from a probate-juvenile court is taken to the district court which shall try the case de novo”) (amended to reflect the creation of the Court of Appeals, 1983 Minn.”
In re the Welfare of R.L.A., 431 N.W.2d 152 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 1 (1986). The juvenile court order remains in effect pending appeal, unless the appellate court, in its discretion and upon application, determines that a stay is appropriate.”
Matter of Welfare of G.(nmn) M., 533 N.W.2d 883 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.291, subd. 1 (1994). The appeal shall be taken within 30 days of the filing of the appealable order.”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.