Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 289A.65 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 2005 c 151 art 1 s 117]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1994–2006 · leading case: In Re Eveleth Mines, Inc., 312 B.R. 634 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2004).
In Re Eveleth Mines, Inc., 312 B.R. 634 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2004). “” Minn.Stat. § 289A.65, subd. 1. By its very nature, this “reconsideration” goes only to the matters actually addressed in the making of the assessment.”
Gonzales v. Comm'r of Revenue, 706 N.W.2d 909 (Minn. 2005). “37 (2004) and Minn.Stat. § 289A.65, subd. 8 (2004), finding Gonzales liable for $13,985.”
Piney Ridge Lodge, Inc. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 718 N.W.2d 861 (Minn. 2006). “At the time the Notice of Change in Tax was sent to Piney Ridge, the Department of Revenue administrative review provisions were codified at Minn.Stat. § 289A.65 (2002); the review provisions were recodified as part of a 2005 code-simplification effort, at Minn.”
Klein Bancorporation, Inc. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 581 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “7 provides, in relevant part: (a) If the taxpayer is notified by the commissioner that the refund claim is denied in whole or in part, the taxpayer may: (1) file an administrative appeal as provided in section 289A.65, or an appeal with the tax court, within 60 days after…”
Baertsch v. Minnesota Dep't of Revenue, 518 N.W.2d 21 (Minn. 1994). “They argue that “appeals,” under Minn.Stat. § 289A.65, subd. 1, are those cases in which taxpayers wish to challenge “an order assessing tax, a denial of a request for abatement of penalty, or denial of a claim for refund,” and therefore in this case they are not pursuing an…”
Bisciglia v. Lee, 370 F. Supp. 2d 874 (D. Minnesota 2005). “Minn.Stat. § 289A.65, subd. 1 (2004). In the state judicial system, the Minnesota Tax Court has jurisdiction over appeals from any order of the Commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.