Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 299A.43 (2026)
Eligibility Determination; Contested Case
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A challenge to a determination of eligibility by the commissioner of public safety must be heard as a contested case, except that the decision of the administrative law judge is binding on the parties to the proceeding. The order of the administrative law judge is the final decision of the commissioner. The hearing must be conducted according to sections 14.56 to 14.62 and is subject to appeal according to sections 14.63 to 14.68.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: In the Matter of a Pub. Saf. Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) (Minn. 2026).
In the Matter of a Pub. Saf. Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) (Minn. 2026). “The next day, the Office of Administrative Hearings issued a correction that the order “serve[d] as the binding and final decision in this matter” under Minn. Stat. § 299A.43. 8 included or excluded by the [L]egislature in Minn.”
Gohman v. Stavrum, 482 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “See Minn.Stat. § 299A.43. DECISION Benefits awarded under 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.