Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 3.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1961 c 561 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1964–2016 · leading case: State v. Edwards, 717 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2006).
State v. Edwards, 717 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2006). “" Model Penal Code § 3.04 cmt. 4(b) (1985). And Professor Robinson has proposed a culpability analysis that would assess the aggressor's liability on the basis of the level of culpability shown in the earlier conduct of causing the conditions of his own defense.”
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013). “§ 3.04. In contrast, under the positional risk doctrine, an employee satisfies both the “arising out of’ and “in the course of’ requirements without regard to risk “if [the injury] would not have occurred but for the fact that the conditions and obligations of the employment…”
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington, 128 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 1964). “” The Bloomington charter contains the following pertinent provisions respecting the manner in which ordinances may be adopted: § 3.04. “Except as in this charter otherwise provided, all legislation shah be by ordinance.”
Nat'l Union Ins. v. Holmes & Graven, 23 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (D. Minnesota 1998). “As an ultimate Conclusion of Law, the Court “denie[d] the HRA’s request for a declaration that other than for the Gross-up Amount defined in Section 3.04, the HRA has no personal liability for any of its obligations under the Indenture and that it has no obligation to use…”
Olsen v. City of Hopkins, 149 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. 1967). “12 Section 3.04 of the Hopkins City Charter requires publication of all ordinances.”
Oasis Publ'g Co. v. West Publ'g Co., 924 F. Supp. 918 (D. Minnesota 1996). “Nimmer, Copyright § 3.04[B][2], p. 3-33 (footnotes omitted).”
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Ins. Grp., 402 N.W.2d 119 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Ordinary and necessary services are not limited to routine household services and may extend to services which the insured might normally be expected to perform as reflected in his or her prior history and usual practice in such matters.”
Lenz v. Depositors Ins. Co., 561 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “(CBC) § 3.04[1] (Oct. 1984). Our conclusion is further supported by Fandray v.”
State of Minnesota v. James Nils Andersen (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “” LMCD Code of Ordinances § 3.04, subd. 1(a) (2004). Spies testified that the sole reason why he stopped the boat was that the red and green lights were not in the front half of the boat.”
State of Minnesota v. Angela Tharnaa Hooks (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “individual judgment” or “surrender[ing] [an] honest opinion .”
— Minn. Stat. § 3.04(2)(b)(i) — 1 case
State v. Edwards, 717 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2006). “" Model Penal Code § 3.04 cmt. 4(b) (1985). And Professor Robinson has proposed a culpability analysis that would assess the aggressor's liability on the basis of the level of culpability shown in the earlier conduct of causing the conditions of his own defense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.