Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 3.42 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Expired, 1953 c 749 s 26]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1977–2003 · leading case: Powell v. Anderson, 660 N.W.2d 107 (Minn. 2003).
Powell v. Anderson, 660 N.W.2d 107 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 5× “A Grounds for Disqualification Section 3.42 of the 1994 edition of the Standards Relating to Appellate Courts provides: Disqualification of Judges.”
State Ex Rel. Wild v. Otis, 257 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “Section 3.42, and the commentary thereto, of the A.”
Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm'n on Civil Rights, 295 N.W.2d 523 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “42 (Approved Draft 1977) and its commentary: In the collegial decision-making of an appellate court an individual judge's purely personal views are of less significance than they would be in a trial court and he is subject to collegial restraint should he be inclined to act on…”
Violette v. Midwest Printing Co.-Webb Publ'g, 415 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “With respect to this basis for disqualification, even though the WCCA is an agency of the executive branch, we do not deem it inappropriate to suggest that the WCCA should consider that portion of the commentary of section 3.42 of the ABA Standards of Judicial Administration,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.