Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 3.761 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 15.471]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1987–1993 · leading case: McMains v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 409 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
McMains v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 409 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Minn.Stat. § 3.761, subd. 6(a) (1986). Paragraph (b) expands the definition in paragraph (a) to include “a partner, officer, shareholder, member, or owner of an entity described in paragraph (a).”
In Re the Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of Wang, 441 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 1989). “3 controls what fees the Board may recover if it prevails, we believe that Minn.Stat. § 3.761, subd. 4, which defines expenses as “the costs incurred by the party in the litigation,” evinces a legislative intent as to what items ought to be recoverable as costs in the context of…”
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 469 N.W.2d 718 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “The act defines “substantially justified” to mean that the state’s position had a reasonable basis- in law and fact, based on the totality of the circumstances before and during the litigation or contested case proceeding.”
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes, 444 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. 1989). “See Minn.Stat. § 3.761, subd. 6. It is quite evident the phrase “A party dissatisfied with the fee determination,” as appearing in the appeal section, refers to an aggrieved fee claimant, not to the state agency involved.”
In re the Occupational License of Haymes, 427 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “However, the judge ruled that Hutchinson was a “party” in the Haymes case as a result of the consolidation of the cases and because her racing business was an “unincorporated business” within Minn.Stat. § 3.761, subd. 6(a). The judge also found that the Commission’s position was…”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co., 503 N.W.2d 799 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “” Minn. Stat. § 3.761 -.765 (1992). After a September 1992 hearing, the district court ruled the state’s litigation was not in bad faith and denied Baillon’s request for attorney fees under Minn.”
Snider v. State, Dep't of Transp., 445 N.W.2d 578 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “A “party” is defined in Minn.Stat. § 3.761 (1988) as: Subd. 6. Party, (a) Except as modified by paragraph (b), “party” means a person named or admitted as a party, or seeking and entitled to be admitted as a party, in a court action or contested case proceeding, or a person…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.